ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
A novel device to visualize Descemet membrane during donor preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comment on: A novel device to visualize Descemet membrane during donor preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Commentary: Enhanced donor preparation during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: A reason to rejoice!Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe a novel device for improved visualization of descemet membrane (DM) during donor preparation for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Comparative analysis was performed using this device (group 1) versus conventional technique (group 2) between an experienced and a trainee surgeon. A total of 20 eyes were analyzed in each group. Average time for DM peeling by experienced surgeon was 238.8 + 17.2 s in group 1 and 382.8 + 36.3 s in group 2 (P < 0.0001), and for trainee surgeon it was 519 + 30.8 s and 686.8 + 31.9 s (P < 0.0001). Retro-illumination made it easier to identify the peripheral cut edge of DM and abnormal adhesions to the underlying stroma during peeling. In group 2, DM tear occurred in 2/10 eyes with an experienced surgeon and 4/10 eyes with a trainee surgeon. Our novel device with retro-illumination allows DM peeling for donor preparation in DMEK to be performed safely with reduced risk of tissue damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.