Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011598›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Patient-generated data in the management of HIV: a scoping review.

Clara Hewitt, Karen C Lloyd, Shema Tariq, Abigail Durrant, Caroline Claisse, Bakita Kasadha, Jo Gibbs

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Clara HewittInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-0716
Karen C LloydInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK k.lloyd@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6310-6836
Shema TariqInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9802-7727
Abigail DurrantOpen Lab, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4752-5376
Caroline ClaisseOpen Lab, School of Computing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4002-6136
Bakita KasadhaTerrence Higgins Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-183X
Jo GibbsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-0260
University College London · GBNewcastle University · GBTerrence Higgins Trust · GBThe George Institute for Global Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient-generated data (PGData) are an emergent research area and may improve HIV care. The objectives of this scoping review were to synthesise, evaluate and make recommendations based on the available literature regarding PGData use in HIV care.

designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and Emcare databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies involving PGData use within HIV care for people living with HIV and/or healthcare professionals (HCPs) published before February 2021. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted using a table and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess empirical rigour. We used thematic analysis to evaluate content.

results11 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were observational, predominantly concerned hypothetical or novel digital platforms, mainly conducted in high-income settings, and had small sample sizes (range=10-160). There were multiple definitions of PGData. In the majority of studies (n=9), participants were people living with HIV, with a few studies including HCPs, informatics specialists or mixed participant groups. Participants living with HIV were aged 23-78 years, mostly men, of diverse ethnicities, and had low educational, health literacy and income levels.We identified four key themes: (1) Perceptions of PGData and associated digital platforms; (2) Opportunities; (3) Anticipated barriers and (4) Potential impact on patient-HCP relationships.

conclusionsUse of PGData within HIV care warrants further study, especially with regard to digital inequalities, data privacy and security. There is a need for longitudinal data on use within HIV in a variety of settings with a broad range of users, including impact on clinical outcomes. This will allow greater understanding of the role of PGData use in improving the health and well-being of people living with HIV, which is increasingly pertinent as digital healthcare becomes more widespread as a result of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV InfectionsAdultAgedEthnicityHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Young Adultgenitourinary medicineHIV & AIDStelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34011598
PMCPMC8137219
OpenAlexW3161583040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.