Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011597›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

From screen time to the digital level of analysis: a scoping review of measures for digital media use in children and adolescents.

Dillon Thomas Browne, Shealyn S May, Laura Colucci, Pamela Hurst-Della Pietra, Dimitri Christakis, Tracy Asamoah, Lauren Hale, Katia Delrahim-Howlett, Jennifer A Emond, Alexander G Fiks and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.

Dillon Thomas BrownePsychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada dillon.browne@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7445-6604
Shealyn S MayPsychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Laura ColucciPsychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Pamela Hurst-Della PietraRenaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Dimitri ChristakisSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Tracy AsamoahMedia Committee, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Lauren HaleRenaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Katia Delrahim-HowlettDivision of Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, North Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer A EmondThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine Global Health Tanzania DarDar Programs, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8684-7330
Alexander G FiksDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sheri MadiganPsychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Greg PerlmanRenaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Hans-Jürgen RumpfPsychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry Unit, Research Group S:TEP, University of Luebeck, Lubeck, Germany.
Darcy ThompsonSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Stephen UzzoNew York Hall of Science, Flushing, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6508-3535
Jackie StapletonInformation Services and Resources, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Ross NevilleSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Heather PrimePsychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
MIST Working Group
University of Waterloo · CAStony Brook School · USAmerican Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USNew York Hall of Science · USUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Washington · USYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis scoping review aims to facilitate psychometric developments in the field of digital media usage and well-being in young people by (1) identifying core concepts in the area of "screen time" and digital media use in children, adolescents, and young adults, (2) synthesising existing research paradigms and measurement tools that quantify these dimensions, and (3) highlighting important areas of need to guide future measure development.

designA scoping review of 140 sources (126 database, 14 grey literature) published between 2014 and 2019 yielded 162 measurement tools across a range of domains, users, and cultures. Database sources from Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus were extracted, in addition to grey literature obtained from knowledge experts and organisations relevant to digital media use in children. To be included, the source had to: (1) be an empirical investigation or present original research, (2) investigate a sample/target population that included children or young persons between the ages of 0 and 25 years of age, and (3) include at least one assessment method for measuring digital media use. Reviews, editorials, letters, comments and animal model studies were all excluded. MEASURES: Basic information, level of risk of bias, study setting, paradigm, data type, digital media type, device, usage characteristics, applications or websites, sample characteristics, recruitment methods, measurement tool information, reliability and validity.

resultsSignificant variability in nomenclature surrounding problematic use and criteria for identifying clinical impairment was discovered. Moreover, there was a paucity of measures in key domains, including tools for young children, whole families, disadvantaged groups, and for certain patterns and types of usage.

conclusionThis knowledge synthesis exercise highlights the need for the widespread development and implementation of comprehensive, multi-method, multilevel, and multi-informant measurement suites.

Indexed as

Communications MediaScreen TimeAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolExerciseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInternetReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultchild & adolescent psychiatrycommunity child healthmental healthpaediatricspublic health

Identifiers

PMID34011597
PMCPMC8137212
OpenAlexW3163423374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.