Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011500›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2021

Evolving pharmacovigilance requirements with novel vaccines and vaccine components.

Patrick L F Zuber, Marion Gruber, David C Kaslow, Robert T Chen, Brigitte K Giersing, Martin H Friede

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pivotal role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. [Association between vaccination and the risk of immunoglobulin A vasculitis in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Vaccinations].Der Internist · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick L F ZuberAccess to Medicines and Health Products Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland zuberp@who.int.ORCID 0000-0002-8966-5054
Marion GruberCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drugs Administration, Silver Spring, Massachusetts, USA.
David C KaslowEssential Medicines, PATH, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Robert T ChenBrighton Collaboration, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Brigitte K GiersingImmunization, Vaccines and Biologicals Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Martin H FriedeImmunization, Vaccines and Biologicals Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USThe Task Force for Global Health · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the pipeline of new and upcoming vaccines as it relates to monitoring their safety. Compared with most currently available vaccines, that are constituted of live attenuated organisms or inactive products, future vaccines will also be based on new technologies. Several products that include such technologies are either already licensed or at an advanced stage of clinical development. Those include viral vectors, genetically attenuated live organisms, nucleic acid vaccines, novel adjuvants, increased number of antigens present in a single vaccine, novel mode of vaccine administration and thermostabilisation. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) monitors novel vaccines, from the time they become available for large scale use. GACVS maintains their safety profile as evidence emerges from post-licensure surveillance and observational studies. Vaccines and vaccine formulations produced with novel technologies will have different safety profiles that will require adapting pharmacovigilance approaches. For example, GACVS now considers viral vector templates developed on the model proposed by Brighton Collaboration. The characteristics of those novel products will also have implications for the risk management plans (RMPs). Questions related to the duration of active monitoring for genetic material, presence of adventitious agents more easily detected with enhanced biological screening, or physiological mechanisms of novel adjuvants are all considerations that will belong to the preparation of RMPs. In addition to assessing those novel products and advising experts, GACVS will also consider how to more broadly communicate about risk assessment, so vaccine users can also benefit from the committee's advice.

Indexed as

PharmacovigilanceVaccinesAdvisory CommitteesHumansRisk AssessmentVaccinesimmunisationvaccines

Identifiers

PMID34011500
PMCPMC8137242
OpenAlexW3160749742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.