Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011492›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021

Risk of clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection: retrospective cohort study.

Sarah E Daugherty, Yinglong Guo, Kevin Heath, Micah C Dasmariñas, Karol Giuseppe Jubilo, Jirapat Samranvedhya, Marc Lipsitch, Ken Cohen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 263 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
263citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05386485 unknown statusnot on this map

FUNCTION Study: Follow- Up Study iN SARS-CoV-2 infecTION. Long-term Impact on Cardiopulmonary Function and Quality of Life in Patients Recovered From SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Lima, Peru

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled162ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsNone intervation
NCT05392088 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Characterization and Prognostic Role of Myocardial Injury in Patients With COVID-19. The CardioCOVID Gemelli Study.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,500ConditionsMyocardial Injury, COVID-19ArmsDATA EXTRACTION, FOLLOW-UP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

263 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 442 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Risk of Incident New-Onset Arterial Hypertension After COVID-19 Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Dyslipidaemia as Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection-Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

203 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E DaughertyOptumLabs at UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, MN, USA SarahDaugherty@uhg.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4148-2881
Yinglong GuoOptumLabs at UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kevin HeathOptumCare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Micah C DasmariñasOptumLabs at UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Karol Giuseppe JubiloOptumLabs at UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jirapat SamranvedhyaOptumLabs at UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Marc LipsitchHarvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1504-9213
Ken CohenOptumCare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Optum (United States) · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the excess risk and relative hazards for developing incident clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults aged 18-65.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingThree merged data sources from a large United States health plan: a large national administrative claims database, an outpatient laboratory testing database, and an inpatient hospital admissions database.

participantsIndividuals aged 18-65 with continuous enrollment in the health plan from January 2019 to the date of a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Three comparator groups, matched by propensity score, to individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2: a 2020 comparator group, an historical 2019 comparator group, and an historical comparator group with viral lower respiratory tract illness.

main outcome measuresMore than 50 clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection (defined as the date of first SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (index date) plus 21 days) were identified using ICD-10 (international classification of diseases, 10th revision) codes. Excess risk in the four months after acute infection and hazard ratios with Bonferroni corrected 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

results14% of adults aged ≤65 who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (27 074 of 193 113) had at least one new type of clinical sequelae that required medical care after the acute phase of the illness, which was 4.95% higher than in the 2020 comparator group. The risk for specific new sequelae attributable to SARS-Cov-2 infection after the acute phase, including chronic respiratory failure, cardiac arrythmia, hypercoagulability, encephalopathy, peripheral neuropathy, amnesia (memory difficulty), diabetes, liver test abnormalities, myocarditis, anxiety, and fatigue, was significantly greater than in the three comparator groups (2020, 2019, and viral lower respiratory tract illness groups) (all P<0.001). Significant risk differences because of SARS-CoV-2 infection ranged from 0.02 to 2.26 per 100 people (all P<0.001), and hazard ratios ranged from 1.24 to 25.65 compared with the 2020 comparator group.

conclusionsThe results indicate the excess risk of developing new clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including specific types of sequelae less commonly seen in other viral illnesses. Although individuals who were older, had pre-existing conditions, and were admitted to hospital because of covid-19 were at greatest excess risk, younger adults (aged ≤50), those with no pre-existing conditions, or those not admitted to hospital for covid-19 also had an increased risk of developing new clinical sequelae. The greater risk for incident sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection is relevant for healthcare planning.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34011492
PMCPMC8132065
OpenAlexW3163666887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.