ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021
Risk of clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection: retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 263 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
FUNCTION Study: Follow- Up Study iN SARS-CoV-2 infecTION. Long-term Impact on Cardiopulmonary Function and Quality of Life in Patients Recovered From SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Lima, Peru
Characterization and Prognostic Role of Myocardial Injury in Patients With COVID-19. The CardioCOVID Gemelli Study.
Who cites it
263 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 442 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of new-onset diabetes following COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular outcomes in long COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association of COVID-19 infection and the risk of new incident diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection and incidence of new chronic condition diagnoses: a systematic review.Emerging microbes & infections · 2023Pooled it
- Risk of incident heart failure after COVID-19 recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2023Pooled it
- One-Year Risk of Myocarditis After COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Risk of Incident New-Onset Arterial Hypertension After COVID-19 Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Risk of venous thromboembolic events after COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Pooled it
- Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction after COVID-19 recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- The bidirectional association between diabetes and long-COVID-19 - A systematic review.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence and risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical trials on the pharmacological treatment of long COVID: A systematic review.Journal of medical virology · 2023Pooled it
- Risk of incident diabetes after COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Metabolism: clinical and experimental · 2022Pooled it
- Association of COVID-19 with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Risk for newly diagnosed diabetes after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Dyslipidaemia as Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection-Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Risk of incident diabetes post-COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Primary care diabetes · 2022Pooled it
203 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the excess risk and relative hazards for developing incident clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults aged 18-65.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingThree merged data sources from a large United States health plan: a large national administrative claims database, an outpatient laboratory testing database, and an inpatient hospital admissions database.
participantsIndividuals aged 18-65 with continuous enrollment in the health plan from January 2019 to the date of a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Three comparator groups, matched by propensity score, to individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2: a 2020 comparator group, an historical 2019 comparator group, and an historical comparator group with viral lower respiratory tract illness.
main outcome measuresMore than 50 clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection (defined as the date of first SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (index date) plus 21 days) were identified using ICD-10 (international classification of diseases, 10th revision) codes. Excess risk in the four months after acute infection and hazard ratios with Bonferroni corrected 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
results14% of adults aged ≤65 who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (27 074 of 193 113) had at least one new type of clinical sequelae that required medical care after the acute phase of the illness, which was 4.95% higher than in the 2020 comparator group. The risk for specific new sequelae attributable to SARS-Cov-2 infection after the acute phase, including chronic respiratory failure, cardiac arrythmia, hypercoagulability, encephalopathy, peripheral neuropathy, amnesia (memory difficulty), diabetes, liver test abnormalities, myocarditis, anxiety, and fatigue, was significantly greater than in the three comparator groups (2020, 2019, and viral lower respiratory tract illness groups) (all P<0.001). Significant risk differences because of SARS-CoV-2 infection ranged from 0.02 to 2.26 per 100 people (all P<0.001), and hazard ratios ranged from 1.24 to 25.65 compared with the 2020 comparator group.
conclusionsThe results indicate the excess risk of developing new clinical sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including specific types of sequelae less commonly seen in other viral illnesses. Although individuals who were older, had pre-existing conditions, and were admitted to hospital because of covid-19 were at greatest excess risk, younger adults (aged ≤50), those with no pre-existing conditions, or those not admitted to hospital for covid-19 also had an increased risk of developing new clinical sequelae. The greater risk for incident sequelae after the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection is relevant for healthcare planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.