Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011366›Full record

Observational studyInternational breastfeeding journal2021

Exclusivity of breastfeeding and body composition: learnings from the Baby-bod study.

Sisitha Jayasinghe, Manoja P Herath, Jeffrey M Beckett, Kiran D K Ahuja, Nuala M Byrne, Andrew P Hills

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International breastfeeding journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Maternal Body Composition, Hydration, and Metabolic Health on Breastfeeding Success: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sisitha JayasingheSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Newnham Drive, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8805-385X
Manoja P HerathSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Newnham Drive, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.
Jeffrey M BeckettSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Newnham Drive, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.
Kiran D K AhujaSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Newnham Drive, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.
Nuala M ByrneSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Newnham Drive, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.
Andrew P HillsSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Newnham Drive, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia. andrew.hills@utas.edu.au.
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis report evaluated the breastfeeding status in a Tasmanian cohort and its effects on infant and maternal anthropometry and body composition.

methodsAn observational-cohort analysis of self-reported feeding data from 175 Tasmanian mother-baby dyads (recruited via in-person contact between September 2017 and October 2019), was executed. Only mothers who were ≥ 18 years of age, who had a singleton pregnancy and were able to speak and understand English, were included in the study. Infants outside a gestational age range between 37

resultsFat-free mass was significantly higher [t = 2.27, df = 98, P = 0.03, confidence interval (CI) 0.03, 0.48] in neBF infants at 6 months (5.59 ± 0.59 vs 5.33 ± 0.50 kg) despite a higher mean fat-free mass in eBF infants at birth (2.89 ± 0.34 vs 3.01 ± 0.35 kg). Weak evidence for different fat mass index trajectories was observed for eBF and neBF infants in the first 6 months of life (ANOVA, F = 2.42, df = 1.9, P = 0.09) with an inversion in fat mass index levels between 3 and 6 months. Body Mass Index (BMI) trajectories were significantly different in eBF and neBF mothers through pregnancy and the first 6 months postpartum (ANOVA, F = 5.56, df = 30.14, P = 0.01). Compared with eBF mothers, neBF mothers retained significantly less weight (t = - 2.754, df = 158, P = 0.02, CI -6.64, - 1.09) at 3 months (0.68 ± 11.69 vs 4.55 ± 6.08 kg) postpartum. Prevalence for neBF was incrementally higher in mothers with a normal BMI compared to mothers with obesity, and mothers who underwent surgical or medical intervention during birth were less likely to exclusively breastfeed.

conclusionsInfants with different feeding patterns may display varying growth patterns in early life and sustained breastfeeding can contribute to greater postpartum maternal weight loss.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersBody CompositionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPostpartum PeriodPregnancyBody compositionExclusive breastfeedingNon-exclusive breastfeedingObesityWeight retention

Identifiers

PMID34011366
PMCPMC8132405
OpenAlexW3162725619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.