Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011306›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2021

MiR-3168, miR-6125, and miR-4718 as potential predictors of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with head and neck cancer.

Julia C F Quintanilha, Maria A Cursino, Jessica B Borges, Nadine G Torso, Larissa B Bastos, Juliana M Oliveira, Thiago S Cobaxo, Eder C Pincinato, Mario H Hirata, Murilo V Geraldo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia C F QuintanilhaSchool of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria A CursinoSchool of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jessica B BorgesDante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nadine G TorsoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas, 200 Cândido Portinari Street, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-871, Brazil.
Larissa B BastosFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas, 200 Cândido Portinari Street, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-871, Brazil.
Juliana M OliveiraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas, 200 Cândido Portinari Street, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-871, Brazil.
Thiago S CobaxoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas, 200 Cândido Portinari Street, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-871, Brazil.
Eder C PincinatoSchool of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mario H HirataDante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Murilo V GeraldoInstitute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carmen S P LimaSchool of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Patricia MorielSchool of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. patricia.moriel@fcf.unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/02338-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/11329-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo biomarker is available for identifying cancer patients at risk of developing nephrotoxicity when treated with cisplatin.

methodsWe performed microRNA (miRNA) sequencing using plasma collected 5 days after cisplatin treatment (D5) from twelve patients with head and neck cancer with and without nephrotoxicity (grade ≥ 2 increased serum creatinine). The most differentially expressed miRNAs between the two groups were selected for quantification at baseline and D5 in a larger cohort of patients. The association between miRNAs and nephrotoxicity was evaluated by calculating the odds ratio (OR) from univariate logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to estimate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsMiR-3168 (p = 1.98 × 10

conclusionsWe have provided evidence of baseline plasmatic expression of miR-3168, miR-6125, and miR-4718 as potential predictors of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesChemoradiotherapyCisplatinCreatinineFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorCisplatinCreatinineMicroRNAsMIRN3168 microRNA, humanCisplatinmicroRNAsmiR-3168miR-4718miR-6125Nephrotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID34011306
PMCPMC8136168
OpenAlexW3125930428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.