Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011279›Full record

SynthesisBMC family practice2021

Systematic review of international clinical guidelines for the promotion of physical activity for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

N Aerts, D Le Goff, M Odorico, J Y Le Reste, P Van Bogaert, L Peremans, G Musinguzi, P Van Royen, H Bastiaens

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

N AertsDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. naomi.aerts@uantwerpen.be.
D Le GoffDepartment of General Medicine, SPURBO, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, University of West Brittany, 7479, Brest, EA, France.
M OdoricoDepartment of General Medicine, SPURBO, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, University of West Brittany, 7479, Brest, EA, France.
J Y Le ResteDepartment of General Medicine, SPURBO, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, University of West Brittany, 7479, Brest, EA, France.
P Van BogaertDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
L PeremansDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
G MusinguziDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
P Van RoyenDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
H BastiaensDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FRMakerere University · UG

Funding

Horizon 2020 H2020-EU.3.1.6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular diseases are the world's leading cause of morbidity and mortality. An active lifestyle is one of the cornerstones in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. An initial step in guiding primary prevention programs is to refer to clinical guidelines. We aimed to systematically review clinical practice guidelines on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and their recommendations regarding physical activity.

methodsWe systematically searched Trip Medical Database, PubMed and Guidelines International Network from January 2012 up to December 2020 using the following search strings: 'cardiovascular disease', 'prevention', combined with specific cardiovascular disease risk factors. The identified records were screened for relevance and content. We methodologically assessed the selected guidelines using the AGREE II tool. Recommendations were summarized using a consensus-developed extraction form.

resultsAfter screening, 27 clinical practice guidelines were included, all of which were developed in Western countries and showed consistent rigor of development. Guidelines were consistent about the benefit of regular, moderate-intensity, aerobic physical activity. However, recommendations on strategies to achieve and sustain behavior change varied. Multicomponent interventions, comprising education, counseling and self-management support, are recommended to be delivered by various providers in primary health care or community settings. Guidelines advise to embed patient-centered care and behavioral change techniques in prevention programs.

conclusionsCurrent clinical practice guidelines recommend similar PA lifestyle advice and propose various delivery models to be considered in the design of such interventions. Guidelines identify a gap in evidence on the implementation of these recommendations into practice.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCounselingExerciseHumansLife StylePractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary PreventionBehavior changeCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular risk reductionClinical practice guidelinesLifestyle advicePrimary preventionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34011279
PMCPMC8136198
OpenAlexW3161994387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.