Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34011204›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Development and Application of an Interdisciplinary Rapid Message Testing Model for COVID-19 in North Carolina.

Sophia M Bartels, Katherine Gora Combs, Allison J Lazard, Victoria Shelus, C Hunter Davis, Allison Rothschild, Maura Drewry, Kathryn Carpenter, Emily Newman, Allison Goldblatt and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Overview of Innovative Approaches to Support Timely and Agile Health Communication Research and Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Barriers to and Facilitators of COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors Among North Carolina Residents.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophia M Bartels41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9431-8735
Katherine Gora Combs41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8409-5569
Allison J Lazard222941 Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2502-2850
Victoria Shelus41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
C Hunter Davis41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Allison Rothschild41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Maura Drewry41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kathryn Carpenter41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Emily Newman41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Allison Goldblatt222941 Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nabarun DasguptaInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lauren M Hill41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kurt M Ribisl41474 Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Promoting PrEP shared decision-making and adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women in ZambiaK01MH121186 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HILL, LAUREN · 2020 to 2024
$906k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrom the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, public health officials have sought to develop evidence-based messages to reduce COVID-19 transmission by communicating key information to media outlets and the public. We describe the development of an interdisciplinary rapid message testing model to quickly create, test, and share messages with public health officials for use in health campaigns and policy briefings.

methodsAn interdisciplinary research team from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill assembled in March 2020 to assist the state health department in developing evidence-based messages to influence social distancing behaviors in the state. We developed and iteratively executed a rapid message testing model; the components of the 4-step model were message creation, survey development, survey administration, and analysis and presentation to health department officials. The model was executed 4 times, each during a 7-day period in April and May, and each subsequent survey included new phrasing and/or messaging informed by the previous week's survey. A total of 917 adults from North Carolina participated in the 4 surveys.

resultsSurvey participants rated messages focused on protecting oneself and others higher than messages focused on norms and fear-based approaches. Pairing behaviors with motivations increased participants' desire to social distance across all themes and subgroups. For example, adding "Protect your grandmother, your neighbor with cancer, and your best friend with asthma," to messaging received a 0.9-point higher score than the base message, "Stay 6 feet apart from others when out in public." PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our model to promote social distancing in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic can be used for rapid, iterative message testing during public health emergencies.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationPhysical DistancingAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19Disease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaYoung AdultCOVID-19emergency preparednessmessage testingrapid designsocial distancing

Identifiers

PMID34011204
PMCPMC8202212
OpenAlexW3160893527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.