Observational studyMedicine2021
The value of anti-rods and rings antibodies in patients with nonhepatitis virus infection: A single-center retrospective study from Southwest China.
Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and clinical associations of anti-rods and rings antibodies in ANA-tested patients.Immunologic research · 2026Article
- Beyond hepatitis C: clinical spectrum and demographic characteristics of anti-rods and rings antibodies in a large ANA-positive cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Unmasking the 'rods and rings' antinuclear antibody pattern: a sign of hepatitis C treatment and a risk factor for cerebrovascular disease.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Retrospective evaluation of "Rods and Rings" pattern detected in the anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the clinical significance of anti-rods and rings (anti-RR) antibodies in nonhepatitis virus infection patients from Southwest China.Anti-RR antibodies were determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay in a group of 19,935 individuals with antinuclear antibodies test from January 2017 to December 2019. The laboratory and clinical data were collected. Finally, 66 samples with anti-RR antibodies (0.33%) were detected.In Wilcoxon rank sum test, gamma glutamyl transferase (Z = -3.364, P = .001), alpha-l-fucosidase (AFU) (Z = -2.312, P = .021), uric acid (Z = -1.634, P = .047) and red blood cell distribution width (Z = -2.285, P = .022) were higher in metabolic disease group than nonmetabolic disease group. In independent-samples t test, endogenous creatinine clearance was higher in metabolic disease group than nonmetabolic disease group (t = 2.061, P = .045). During the follow-up period of 37 patients with anti-RR antibodies for 1 to 60 months, the titers of anti-RR were significantly increased in the metabolic disease group (Z = -2.346, P = .019). In binary logistic regression analysis, triglycerides (odds ratio 3.679, 95% confidence interval 1.467-24.779, P = .048) was associated with elevated titers of anti-RR antibodies.In summary, anti-RR in non-hepatitis patients may be a manifestation of metabolic disorders, and has a certain correlation with routine laboratory indicators, which is worthy of the attention from clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.