ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021
Deep learning model for distinguishing novel coronavirus from other chest related infections in X-ray images.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Bayesian mixture expert recognition model for tobacco leaf curing stages based on feature fusion.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Rapid bacterial identification through volatile organic compound analysis and deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Identifying key soil characteristics for Francisella tularensis classification with optimized Machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deviation-support based fuzzy ensemble of multi-modal deep learning classifiers for breast cancer prognosis prediction.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Multiclass malaria parasite recognition based on transformer models and a generative adversarial network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Preliminary Stages for COVID-19 Detection Using Image Processing.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- TOPSIS aided ensemble of CNN models for screening COVID-19 in chest X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Study on transfer learning capabilities for pneumonia classification in chest-x-rays images.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2022Article
- Exploring the Deep-Learning Techniques in Detecting the Presence of Coronavirus in the Chest X-Ray Images: A Comprehensive Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2022Review
- Lung Disease Classification in CXR Images Using Hybrid Inception-ResNet-v2 Model and Edge Computing.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- A depthwise separable dense convolutional network with convolution block attention module for COVID-19 diagnosis on CT scans.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Medical imaging and computational image analysis in COVID-19 diagnosis: A review.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel Coronavirus is deadly for humans and animals. The ease of its dispersion, coupled with its tremendous capability for ailment and death in infected people, makes it a risk to society. The chest X-ray is conventional but hard to interpret radiographic test for initial diagnosis of coronavirus from other related infections. It bears a considerable amount of information on physiological and anatomical features. To extract relevant information from it can occasionally become challenging even for a professional radiologist. In this regard, deep-learning models can help in swift, accurate and reliable outcomes. Existing datasets are small and suffer from the balance issue. In this paper, we prepare a relatively larger and well-balanced dataset as compared to the available datasets. Furthermore, we analyze deep learning models, namely, AlexNet, SqueezeNet, DenseNet201, MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 with numerous variations such as training the models from scratch, fine-tuning without pre-trained weights, fine-tuning along with updating pre-trained weights of all layers, and fine-tuning with pre-trained weights along with applying augmentation. Our results show that fine-tuning with augmentation generates best results in pre-trained models. Finally, we have made architectural adjustments in MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 models to learn more intricate features, which are then merged in our proposed ensemble model. The performance of our model is statistically analyzed against other models using four different performance metrics with paired two-sided t-test on 5 different splits of training and test sets of our dataset. We find that it is statistically better than its competing methods for the four metrics. Thus, the computer-aided classification based on the proposed model can assist radiologists in identifying coronavirus from other related infections in chest X-rays with higher accuracy. This can help in a reliable and speedy diagnosis, thereby saving valuable lives and mitigating the adverse impact on the socioeconomics of our community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.