Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34010596›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021

PeriorbitAI: Artificial Intelligence Automation of Eyelid and Periorbital Measurements.

Alexandra Van Brummen, Julia P Owen, Theodore Spaide, Colin Froines, Randy Lu, Megan Lacy, Marian Blazes, Emily Li, Cecilia S Lee, Aaron Y Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexandra Van BrummenFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Julia P OwenFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Theodore SpaideGenentech Inc, San Francisco, California, USA.
Colin FroinesFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Randy LuFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Megan LacyFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Marian BlazesFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Emily LiFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Cecilia S LeeFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Aaron Y LeeFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Matthew ZhangFrom the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: venwu@uw.edu.

Funding

Aging eyes and aging brains in studying alzheimer's disease: Modern ophthalmic data collection in the adult changes in thought (ACT) studyR01AG060942 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Cecilia Sungmin Lee · 2019 to 2026
$39.4M
Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of diabetic macular edemaK23EY029246 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, AARON · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY029246NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a deep learning semantic segmentation network to automate the assessment of 8 periorbital measurements

designDevelopment and validation of an artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation algorithm

methodsA total of 418 photographs of periorbital areas were used to train a deep learning semantic segmentation model to segment iris, aperture, and brow areas. These data were used to develop a post-processing algorithm that measured margin reflex distance (MRD) 1 and 2, medial canthal height (MCH), lateral canthal height (LCH), medial brow height (MBH), lateral brow height (LBH), medial intercanthal distance (MID), and lateral intercanthal distance (LID). The algorithm validity was evaluated on a prospective hold-out test set against 3 graders. The main outcome measures were dice coefficient, mean absolute difference, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis. A smartphone video was also segmented and evaluated as proof of concept.

resultsThe AI algorithm performed in close agreement with all human graders, with a mean absolute difference of 0.5 mm for MRD1, MRD2, LCH, and MCH. The mean absolute difference between graders is approximately 1.5-2 mm for LBH and MBH and approximately 2-4 mm for MID and LID. The 95% confidence intervals for all graders overlapped in most cases, demonstrating that the algorithm performs similarly to human graders. The segmentation of a smartphone video demonstrated that MRD1 can be dynamically measured.

conclusionsWe present, to our knowledge, the first open-sourced, artificial intelligence system capable of automating static and dynamic periorbital measurements. A fully automated tool stands to transform the delivery of clinical care and quantification of surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEyelidsAutomationFaceHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34010596
PMCPMC8862636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.