ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2021
Opportunities for Adding Undernutrition and Frailty Screening Measures in US National Surveys.
Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global frailty screening tools: Review and application of frailty screening tools from 2001 to 2023.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2024Review
- Prevalence Rates and Characteristics of Malnutrition, Frailty, and Other Nutrition and Muscle Mass-Related Conditions Document Potential Quality of Care Gap for Medicare Patients in US Skilled Nursing Facilities.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both undernutrition and frailty adversely affect the health and functional outcomes of the older adult population. Timely and accurate national data are necessary to assess those at risk of these debilitating but often preventable conditions, to correct them and support healthy aging. The objective was to identify relevant measures in undernutrition and frailty screening tools and determine if these measures are collected in recent protocols for US national surveys sampling older adults and which measures could be added to be able to better assess risk of undernutrition and frailty. Commonly used undernutrition and frailty screening tools were evaluated to identify measures that were unique or common to both. US national surveys were examined to determine whether they included older adults in their survey sample, collected health measures from participants, in what form, and whether they were functional indexes or survey questions. A comparative analysis of survey protocols was performed to determine which surveys collected data related to the measures of undernutrition and frailty. Of the 8 national surveys, only 3 provided ≥1 physical measurement (i.e., height/weight, grip strength, balance). Most surveys included self-reported data on height/weight, physical functioning/mobility, disability, and psychological components. Whereas 6 included questions on food security/food program participation, only 1 collected data on dietary intake. Currently national surveys include only limited health measures that can be used to identify undernutrition and frailty risk in older adults. Adding a few simple screening measures already included in popular screening tools, such as grip strength, unintentional weight loss, and loss of appetite, to national surveys which monitor older Americans would facilitate estimation of the prevalence of undernutrition and frailty risk, better estimate those at risk, provide an opportunity to set national goals to reduce their risk, and help implement strategies for improved health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.