ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021
Evaluating resampling methods and structured features to improve fall incident report identification by the severity level.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming patient safety with intelligent systems-A systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The use of natural language processing in detecting and predicting falls within the healthcare setting: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023Pooled it
- Performance of Natural Language Processing versus International Classification of Diseases Codes in Building Registries for Patients With Fall Injury: Retrospective Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- A pathway from fragmentation to interoperability through standards-based enterprise architecture to enhance patient safety.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Development and validation of an interpretable longitudinal preeclampsia risk prediction using machine learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- A large dataset of annotated incident reports on medication errors.Scientific data · 2024Article
- A machine learning-based prediction model for postoperative delirium in cardiac valve surgery using electronic health records.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Using Healthcare Resources Wisely: A Predictive Support System Regarding the Severity of Patient Falls.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to improve the classification of the fall incident severity level by considering data imbalance issues and structured features through machine learning. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe present an incident report classification (IRC) framework to classify the in-hospital fall incident severity level by addressing the imbalanced class problem and incorporating structured attributes. After text preprocessing, bag-of-words features, structured text features, and structured clinical features were extracted from the reports. Next, resampling techniques were incorporated into the training process. Machine learning algorithms were used to build classification models. IRC systems were trained, validated, and tested using a repeated and randomly stratified shuffle-split cross-validation method. Finally, we evaluated the system performance using the F1-measure, precision, and recall over 15 stratified test sets.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrated that the classification system setting considering both data imbalance issues and structured features outperformed the other system settings (with a mean macro-averaged F1-measure of 0.733). Considering the structured features and resampling techniques, this classification system setting significantly improved the mean F1-measure for the rare class by 30.88% (P value < .001) and the mean macro-averaged F1-measure by 8.26% from the baseline system setting (P value < .001). In general, the classification system employing the random forest algorithm and random oversampling method outperformed the others.
conclusionsStructured features provide essential information for categorizing the fall incident severity level. Resampling methods help rebalance the class distribution of the original incident report data, which improves the performance of machine learning models. The IRC framework presented in this study effectively automates the identification of fall incident reports by the severity level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.