Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34009627›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted total pancreatectomy: a pilot western series.

Emanuele F Kauffmann, Niccolò Napoli, Valerio Genovese, Michael Ginesini, Cesare Gianfaldoni, Fabio Vistoli, Gabriella Amorese, Ugo Boggi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuele F KauffmannDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-4844
Niccolò NapoliDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-9158
Valerio GenoveseDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Michael GinesiniDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Cesare GianfaldoniDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Fabio VistoliDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-4191
Gabriella AmoreseDivision of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Ugo BoggiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. u.boggi@med.unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-5896
University of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of robot-assisted total pancreatectomy (RATP) to open total pancreatectomy (OPT) based on an intention-to-treat analysis, having occurrence of severe post-operative complications (SPC) as primary study endpoint. The two groups were matched (2:1) by propensity scores. Assuming a rate of SPC of 22.5% (non-inferiority margin: 15%; α: 0.05; β: 0.20; power: 80%), a total of 25 patients were required per group. During the study period (October 2008-December 2019), 209 patients received a total pancreatectomy. After application of exclusion and inclusion criteria, matched groups were extracted from an overall cohort of 132 patients (OPT: 107; RATP: 25). Before matching, the two groups were different with respect to prevalence of cardiac disease (24.3% versus 4.0%; p = 0.03), presence of jaundice (45.8% versus 12.0%; p = 0.002), presence of a biliary drainage (23.4% versus 0; p  = 0.004), history of weight loss (28.0% versus 8.0%; p = 0.04), and vein involvement (55.1% versus 28.0%) (p = 0.03). After matching, the two groups (OTP: 50; RATP: 25) were well balanced. Regarding primary study endpoint, SPC developed in 13 patients (26.0%) after OTP and in 6 patients (24.0%) after RATP (p = 0.85). Regarding secondary study endpoints, RATP was associated with longer median operating times [475 (408.8-582.5) versus 585 min (525-637.5) p = 0.003]. After a median follow-up time of 23.7 months (10.4-71), overall survival time [22.6 (11.2-81.2) versus NA (27.3-NA) p = 0.006] and cancer-specific survival [22.6 (11.2-NA) versus NA (27.3-NA) p = 0.02] were improved in patients undergoing RATP. In carefully selected patients, robot-assisted total pancreatectomy is non-inferior to open total pancreatectomy regarding occurrence of severe post-operative complications.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesHumansPancreatectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomePancreatic cancerRobotic pancreatectomyRobotic pancreatoduodenectomyRobotic total pancreatectomySurgical complicationsTotal pancreatectomy

Identifiers

PMID34009627
PMCPMC8184722
OpenAlexW3161757707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.