Trial reportLasers in medical science2022
Low-fluence and low-density CO2 laser: histological analysis of collagen fiber changes in skin and its clinical repercussions in photorejuvenation.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Skin manifestations of hyperandrogenism: an update.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
- Long-term efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide (COAmerican journal of translational research · 2025Article
- The phenomenon of skin contraction in COLasers in medical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study refers to clinical and histologic analysis of effects on photorejuvenation after one single treatment of fractional CO2 laser with low fluence and low density. To analyze histologically the quantitative variation of collagen fibers type I and III, elastic fibers, and epidermal thickness on D84, besides clinical evaluation of amount, length, thickness, and depth of periocular wrinkles during the same period. This is an open, prospective, interventional study. There were 40 healthy female with age between 35 and 65 years. Twenty-six participants were randomly selected for D0 and D84 biopsy. A single session of fractional CO2 laser was done in the hole face, using a 800-µm tip, 5% density, and 10 mJ fluence with a single pass. On D0, D42, and D84, a clinical comparative analysis of amount, length, depth, and thickness of periocular wrinkles has been done. On histological analysis, a comparative quantitative evaluation of collagen fibers type I and III, elastic fibers, and epidermal thickness has been done on D0 and D84. The results of this study denoted a significant clinical improvement of amount (- 32.17%; p < 0.0001), thickness (- 33%; p < 0.0001), lenght (- 35.84%; p < 0.0001), and depth of periocular wrinkles (- 32.46%; p < 0.0001). A significant increase in the amount of collagen fibers type III was observed on D84 (+ 60.67%; p = 0.0013). Collagen fibers type I and elastic fibers did not have the same result, with a nonsignificant increase (+ 8.31%; p = 0.3820) and a decrease (- 12.4%; p = 0.0585) respectively. Epidermal thickness has a tendency to significant variation (p = 0.05553). The results demonstrate that fractional CO2 laser with low fluence and low density is a safe and efficient option for photorejuvenation of the face.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.