Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34009507›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

Results of Shouldice hernia repair after 18 years of follow-up in all the patients.

A Martín Duce, O Lozano, M Galván, A Muriel, S Villeta, J Gómez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A "New" Nonmesh Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair: Revisiting E. Wyllys Andrews and His Imbricating Operation.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. It's time to re-acknowledge the differences.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. It's time to re-acknowledge the differences: author's reply.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A Martín DuceFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Alcalá University, Plaza de San Diego s/n, 28801, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. martinduce@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8751-9224
O LozanoDepartment of General Surgery, Los Arcos del Mar Menor University Hospital, San Javier, Spain.
M GalvánDepartment of General Surgery, Los Arcos del Mar Menor University Hospital, San Javier, Spain.
A MurielFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Alcalá University, Plaza de San Diego s/n, 28801, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
S VilletaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Alcalá University, Plaza de San Diego s/n, 28801, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
J GómezFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Alcalá University, Plaza de San Diego s/n, 28801, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluate the long-term efficacy of the Shouldice technique performed by non-specialized surgeons and also to reflex on the quality parameters necessary to safely assess hernia recurrence rates.

methodsDuring 3 years, a prospective study was conducted in 243 adult men who underwent surgery for primary inguinal hernias by 13 junior surgeons with an interest in hernia surgery. Using local anesthesia, a classic 4 step Shouldice repair, with polypropylene or polyester, was performed. All patients were followed for 18 years. The follow-up met the nine quality criteria proposed by the authors.

resultsAt 18 years, 80.2% of patients were followed and only 6.5% were lost. There were 7 recurrences in the first 10 years, 5 of them secondary to a direct hernia, and the same after 18 years. The recurrence rate was 2.88%. Tolerance of the local anesthesia was excellent in 91.4%of patients and, after 3 years, the pain was considered moderate or severe in 4 patients (1.8%).

conclusionsIt is necessary to incorporate more demanding criteria in the assessment of recurrence, to give more valid results. The Shouldice technique remains a useful technique today not only in patients under 30 years of age, and in the absence of risk factors, but also in cases of intolerance, patient rejection or absence of mesh. In addition, it provides the clinical and economic advantages of being possible to perform it under local anesthesia.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyAdultFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePolypropylenesProspective StudiesRecurrenceSurgical MeshPolypropylenesInguinal herniaPostoperative painQuality of follow-upShouldice repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.