Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34009471›Full record

ArticleOecologia2021

Local flexibility in feeding behaviour and contrasting microhabitat use of an omnivore across latitudes.

Jean-Charles Leclerc, Thibaut de Bettignies, Florian de Bettignies, Hartvig Christie, João N Franco, Cédric Leroux, Dominique Davoult, Morten F Pedersen, Karen Filbee-Dexter, Thomas Wernberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jean-Charles LeclercSorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7144 AD2M, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680, Roscoff, France. leclercjc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3663-3785
Thibaut de BettigniesUMS Patrimoine Naturel (PATRINAT), AFB-CNRS-MNHN, CP41, 36 rue Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 75005, Paris, France.
Florian de BettigniesSorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7144 AD2M, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680, Roscoff, France.
Hartvig ChristieMarine Biology Section, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway.
João N FrancoCIIMAR, Terminal de Cruzeiros de Leixões. Av. General Norton de Matos, 4450-208, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Cédric LerouxSorbonne Université, CNRS, FR 2424, Station Biologique, Place Georges Teissier, 29680, Roscoff, France.
Dominique DavoultSorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7144 AD2M, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680, Roscoff, France.
Morten F PedersenDepartment for Science and Environment (DSE), Roskilde University, PO Box 260, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Karen Filbee-DexterSchool of Biological Sciences and UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, 39 Fairway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Thomas WernbergSchool of Biological Sciences and UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, 39 Fairway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-BTBR-04Australian Research Council DP190100058Australian Research Council FT110100174Norges Forskningsråd 255085/E40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the environment is getting warmer and species are redistributed, consumers can be forced to adjust their interactions with available prey, and this could have cascading effects within food webs. To better understand the capacity for foraging flexibility, our study aimed to determine the diet variability of an ectotherm omnivore inhabiting kelp forests, the sea urchin Echinus esculentus, along its entire latitudinal distribution in the northeast Atlantic. Using a combination of gut content and stable isotope analyses, we determined the diet and trophic position of sea urchins at sites in Portugal (42° N), France (49° N), southern Norway (63° N), and northern Norway (70° N), and related these results to the local abundance and distribution of putative food items. With mean estimated trophic levels ranging from 2.4 to 4.6, omnivory and diet varied substantially within and between sites but not across latitudes. Diet composition generally reflected prey availability within epiphyte or understorey assemblages, with local affinities demonstrating that the sea urchin adjusts its foraging to match the small-scale distribution of food items. A net "preference" for epiphytic food sources was found in northern Norway, where understorey food was limited compared to other regions. We conclude that diet change may occur in response to food source redistribution at multiple spatial scales (microhabitats, sites, regions). Across these scales, the way that key consumers alter their foraging in response to food availability can have important implication for food web dynamics and ecosystem functions along current and future environmental gradients.

Indexed as

EcosystemFood ChainAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFranceNorwaySea UrchinsEchinus esculentusFood webLaminaria hyperboreaOpportunismTrophic plasticityUrchin grazing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.