Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34009036›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2021

A pilot study to assess the circulating renin-angiotensin system in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure.

D Clark Files, Kevin W Gibbs, Christopher L Schaich, Sean P Collins, TanYa M Gwathmey, Jonathan D Casey, Wesley H Self, Mark C Chappell

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Losartan on Patients Hospitalized for Acute COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Current drug discovery technologies · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Plasmatic renin-angiotensin system in normotensive and hypertensive patients hospitalized with COVID-19.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D Clark FilesWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1595-4080
Kevin W GibbsWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5272-2289
Christopher L SchaichWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Sean P CollinsVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
TanYa M GwathmeyWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Jonathan D CaseyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-0977-290X
Wesley H SelfVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Mark C ChappellWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5869-6037
Wake Forest University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is fundamental to COVID-19 pathobiology, due to the interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) coreceptor for cellular entry. The prevailing hypothesis is that SARS-CoV-2-ACE2 interactions lead to an imbalance of the RAS, favoring proinflammatory angiotensin II (ANG II)-related signaling at the expense of the anti-inflammatory ANG-(1-7)-mediated alternative pathway. Indeed, multiple clinical trials targeting this pathway in COVID-19 are underway. Therefore, precise measurement of circulating RAS components is critical to understand the interplay of the RAS on COVID-19 outcomes. Multiple challenges exist in measuring the RAS in COVID-19, including improper patient controls, ex vivo degradation and low concentrations of angiotensins, and unvalidated laboratory assays. Here, we conducted a prospective pilot study to enroll 33 patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 and physiologically matched COVID-19-negative controls to quantify the circulating RAS. Our enrollment strategy led to physiological matching of COVID-19-negative and COVID-19-positive moderate hypoxic respiratory failure cohorts, in contrast to the severe COVID-19 cohort, which had increased severity of illness, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and increased mortality. Circulating ANG II and ANG-(1-7) levels were measured in the low picomolar (pM) range. We found no significant differences in circulating RAS peptides or peptidases between these three cohorts. The combined moderate and severe COVID-19-positive cohorts demonstrated a mild reduction in ACE activity compared with COVID-19-negative controls (2.2 ± 0.9 × 10

Indexed as

Renin-Angiotensin SystemAdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Angiotensin IAngiotensin IICOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPilot ProjectsRespiratory InsufficiencySARS-CoV-2ACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Angiotensin Iangiotensin I (1-7)Angiotensin IIPeptide FragmentsACE2acute respiratory distress syndromeangiotensincritical careSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34009036
PMCPMC8270515
OpenAlexW3161330645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.