The Six-Minute Step Test as an Alternative for Functional Capacity Assessment in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A single bout of submaximal aerobic functional capacity test acutely promotes endothelial function in long COVID patients.Scientific reports · 2026
   Article
2. The six-minute step test can predict COPD exacerbations: a 36-month follow-up study.Scientific reports · 2024
   Article
3. Validation of the Duke Activity Status Index questionnaire by telephone In individuals after stroke.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The Six-Minute Step Test as a Predictor of Functional Capacity according to Peak VO2 in Cardiac Patients.2021

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as