Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34008703›Full record

Trial reportArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2021

ROUX-IN-Y GASTROJEJUNAL BYPASS: WHICH ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUE HAS BEST RESULTS?

Arthur Ruzzon, Paulo Afonso Nunes Nassif, Lais Prigol, Lucas Buzo, Guilherme Wendler, Eduardo Wendler, Ilana Barrichello Torres Wendler, Igor Ruzzon, Caio Henrique Marchette Goveia, Lucas Augusto Prestes Gonçalves

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SHORTEN PREOPERATIVE FASTING AND INTRODUCING EARLY EATING ASSISTANCE IN RECOVERY AFTER GASTROJEJUNAL BYPASS?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. IS THE WAIST/HEIGHT RATIO A BETTER PARAMETER THAN BMI IN DETERMINING THE CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK PROFILE OF OBESE PEOPLE?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Arthur RuzzonPostgraduate Program in Principles of Surgery, Mackenzie Evangelical College of Paraná/Medical Research Institute, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-7133
Paulo Afonso Nunes NassifPostgraduate Program in Principles of Surgery, Mackenzie Evangelical College of Paraná/Medical Research Institute, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-5837
Lais PrigolRocio Hospital, Campo Largo, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-8419
Guilherme WendlerRocio Hospital, Campo Largo, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4074-9521
Ilana Barrichello Torres WendlerORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-8395
Igor RuzzonRocio Hospital, Campo Largo, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5790-9341
Caio Henrique Marchette GoveiaORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3315-5039
Lucas Augusto Prestes GonçalvesORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-3631
Hospital Felício Rocho · BRHospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba · BRSchiller International University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNausea and vomiting groups x moments. As the number of bariatric operations increases, there is a greater interest in knowledge, experience and skills in the operative and anesthetic management of obese people. Anesthetic recovery is an important point in the therapeutic approach and less adverse effects delaying discharge of these patients are necessary to be kept in mind by the surgical team.

aimTo compare anesthetic-analgesic techniques in the opioid-sparing era through epidural administration of local anesthetic associated with low-dose morphine vs. clonidine and analyze the impact of analgesia on the effectiveness of postoperative recovery by comparing these two techniques.

methodsRandomized, double-blind clinical trial with 66 patients candidates for Roux-en-Y gastrojejunal bypass divided into two groups: morphine group and clonidine group. Multimodal analgesia included epidural anesthesia with 0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml at the eighth thoracic vertebra with the association of morphine (morphine group) at a dose of 15 mcg / kg or clonidine (clonidine group) at a dose of 1 mcg / kg.

resultsThe groups were homogeneous and statistical significance was found when analyzing the difference in pain between them in the first postoperative period. The pain was higher in the clonidine group, as in this period, analgesic rescue was also better in this group. In the other times, there was no significance in the differences regarding pain and rescue. The return of intestinal motility in the morphine group was earlier in the first postoperative period. Nausea, vomiting and hospital discharge did not show significant differences between groups.

conclusionEpidural anesthesia with low-dose morphine allowed less pain during the entire hospital stay, with a positive impact on patient recovery.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodHumansMorphinePostoperative PainRopivacaineAnesthetics, LocalMorphineRopivacaine

Identifiers

PMID34008703
PMCPMC8121063
OpenAlexW3163493045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.