ArticleNanoscale2021
Membrane-curvature-mediated co-endocytosis of bystander and functional nanoparticles.
Article in Nanoscale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological Responses to Combined Nanoparticles: Uptake, Distribution and Toxicity.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bending the rules: curvature's impact on cell biology.BMC biology · 2025Review
- Exosomal transmission of viruses, a two-edged biological sword.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Review
- Simultaneous Exposure of Different Nanoparticles Influences Cell Uptake.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Interplay of receptor-ligand binding and lipid domain formation during cell adhesion.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient cellular uptake of nanoparticles (NPs) is necessary for the development of nanomedicine in biomedical applications. Recently, the coadministration of functionalized NPs (FNPs) was shown to stimulate the cellular uptake of nonfunctionalized NPs (termed bystander NPs, BNPs), which presents a new strategy to achieve synergistic delivery. However, a mechanistic understanding of the underlying mechanism is still lacking. In this work, the bystander uptake effect was investigated at the cell membrane level by combining the coarse-grained molecular dynamics, potential of mean force calculation and theoretical energy analysis methods. The membrane internalization efficiency of BNPs was enhanced by co-administered FNPs, and such activity depends on the affinity of both NPs to the membrane and the resultant membrane deformation. The membrane-curvature-mediated attraction and aggregation of NPs facilitated the membrane uptake of BNPs. Furthermore, quantitative suggestions were given to modulate the BNP internalization through controlling the FNP properties such as size, concentration and surface-ligand density. Our results provide insight into the molecular mechanism of the bystander uptake effect, and offer a practical guide to regulate the cellular internalization of NPs for targeted and efficient delivery to cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.