ArticleLab on a chip2021
Multi-oscillation microrheology
Article in Lab on a chip, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myocardial mechanics displaying on visual structural color hydrogel microcolumn arrays.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Direct mechanical communication of cellular to nuclear shapes in oocytes.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Beyond the Single Molecule: Multiplexed Methods in Force Spectroscopy.Annual review of biophysics · 2026Review
- Probing the Dynamic Strength of Biomolecular Interactions with Single-Cell Centrifugation.ACS central science · 2025Article
- Extracellular Matrix Viscoelasticity: A Dynamic Regulator of Cellular Behavior.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Effects of Shear and Extensional Stresses on Cells: Investigation in a Spiral Microchannel and Contraction-Expansion Arrays.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Revealing Mechanopathology Induced by Dengue NS1 Using Organ Chips and Single-Cell Force Spectroscopy.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- High-Throughput Centrifuge Force Microscopy Reveals Dynamic Immune-Cell Avidity at the Single-Cell Level.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Accessing activity and viscoelastic properties of artificial and living systems from passive measurement.Nature materials · 2024Article
- Viscoelasticity of diverse biological samples quantified by Acoustic Force Microrheology (AFMR).Communications biology · 2024Article
- Multiplexed Single-Cell Rheology Probing Using Surface Acoustic Waves.Small science · 2024Article
- Combining DNA scaffolds and acoustic force spectroscopy to characterize individual protein bonds.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Trends in mechanobiology guided tissue engineering and tools to study cell-substrate interactions: a brief review.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- Microfluidic techniques for mechanical measurements of biological samples.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Sounding a New Era in Biomechanics with Acoustic Force Spectroscopy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Quantitative Acoustophoresis.ACS nanoscience Au · 2022Article
- Single-cell analysis reveals chemokine-mediated differential regulation of monocyte mechanics.iScience · 2022Article
- Human endothelial cells display a rapid tensional stress increase in response to tumor necrosis factor-α.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active microrheology is one of the main methods to determine the mechanical properties of cells and tissue, and the modelling of these viscoelastic properties is under heavy debate with many competing approaches. Most experimental methods of active microrheology such as optical tweezers or atomic force microscopy based approaches rely on single cell measurements, and thus suffer from a low throughput. Here, we present a novel method for frequency-dependent microrheology on cells using acoustic forces which allows multiplexed measurements of several cells in parallel. Acoustic force spectroscopy (AFS) is used to generate multi-oscillatory forces in the range of pN-nN on particles attached to primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) cultivated inside a microfluidic chip. While the AFS was introduced as a single-molecule technique to measure mechanochemical properties of biomolecules, we exploit the AFS to measure the dynamic viscoelastic properties of cells exposed to different conditions, such as flow shear stresses or drug injections. By controlling the force and measuring the position of the particle, the complex shear modulus G*(ω) can be measured continuously over several hours. The resulting power-law shear moduli are consistent with fractional viscoelastic models. In our experiments we confirm a decrease in shear modulus after perturbing the actin cytoskeleton via cytochalasin B. This effect was reversible after washing out the drug. Additionally, we include critical information for the usage of the new method AFS as a measurement tool showing its capabilities and limitations and we find that for performing viscoelastic measurements with the AFS, a thorough calibration and careful data analysis is crucial, for which we provide protocols and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.