ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2022
Search for solutions, learning, simulation, and choice processes in suicidal behavior.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors and alterations in positive valence systems: A systematic review of the literature.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Pooled it
- When Losses Matter More: A Dynamic Reference-Dependent Evaluation of Suicide Risk.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
- When to quit: Calibration of voluntary persistence and attempted suicide in depression.Behaviour research and therapy · 2026Article
- Mood computational mechanisms underlying increased risk behavior in adolescent suicidal patients.eLife · 2026Article
- Computational Modeling of Uncertainty and Volatility Beliefs in Escape-Avoidance Learning: Comparing Individuals with and Without Suicidal Ideation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Using the death/suicide implicit association task to prospectively predict near-term suicidal behavior in high-risk veterans.Behaviour research and therapy · 2025Article
- Review: Suicide and its relationship to aggression and impulsivity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Review
- Past suicide attempt is associated with a weaker decision-making bias to actively escape from suicide-related stimuli.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025Article
- Negative affect-driven impulsivity as hierarchical model-based overgeneralization.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Multi-modal risk factors differentiate suicide attempters from ideators in military veterans with major depressive disorder.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
- Do people know how suicidal they will be? Understanding suicidal prospection.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2024Article
- Reward-based option competition in human dorsal stream and transition from stochastic exploration to exploitation in continuous space.Science advances · 2024Article
- Suicide prevention and ketamine: insights from computational modeling.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Negative affectivity and disinhibition as moderators of an interpersonal pathway to suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022Article
- Integrating a functional view on suicide risk into idiographic statistical models.Behaviour research and therapy · 2022Article
- Search for solutions, learning, simulation, and choice processes in suicidal behavior.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022Review
- Enhancing the Psychometric Properties of the Iowa Gambling Task Using Full Generative Modeling.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- A Computational Model of Hopelessness and Active-Escape Bias in Suicidality.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suicide may be viewed as an unfortunate outcome of failures in decision processes. Such failures occur when the demands of a crisis exceed a person's capacity to (i) search for options, (ii) learn and simulate possible futures, and (iii) make advantageous value-based choices. Can individual-level decision deficits and biases drive the progression of the suicidal crisis? Our overview of the evidence on this question is informed by clinical theory and grounded in reinforcement learning and behavioral economics. Cohort and case-control studies provide strong evidence that limited cognitive capacity and particularly impaired cognitive control are associated with suicidal behavior, imposing cognitive constraints on decision-making. We conceptualize suicidal ideation as an element of impoverished consideration sets resulting from a search for solutions under cognitive constraints and mood-congruent Pavlovian influences, a view supported by mostly indirect evidence. More compelling is the evidence of impaired learning in people with a history of suicidal behavior. We speculate that an inability to simulate alternative futures using one's model of the world may undermine alternative solutions in a suicidal crisis. The hypothesis supported by the strongest evidence is that the selection of suicide over alternatives is facilitated by a choice process undermined by randomness. Case-control studies using gambling tasks, armed bandits, and delay discounting support this claim. Future experimental studies will need to uncover real-time dynamics of choice processes in suicidal people. In summary, the decision process framework sheds light on neurocognitive mechanisms that facilitate the progression of the suicidal crisis. This article is categorized under: Economics > Individual Decision-Making Psychology > Emotion and Motivation Psychology > Learning Neuroscience > Behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.