ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2021
To relieve pain or avoid opioid-related risk? A comparison of parents' analgesic trade-off preferences and decision-making in 2019 versus 2013 in a single U.S. pediatric hospital.
Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing risk perception may be insufficient to curtail prescription opioid use and misuse among youth after surgery: A randomized controlled trial.Patient education and counseling · 2022Trial
- Moving Away from One-Size-Fits-All: Assessing the Use of Pharmacogenetic-Guided Medication Therapy in Pediatric Patients with Chronic Pain.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnalgesic trade-off preferences, or the relative preference for pain relief vs. risk aversion, shape parents' decisions to give prescription opioids to their children. These preferences may be influenced by personal experiences and societal factors.
aimTo examine whether parental analgesic trade-off preferences and opioid decision-making have shifted toward risk aversion during the opioid crisis in the United States.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the preoperative survey data of parents from a single U.S. pediatric hospital whose children aged 5-17 years were to undergo painful surgery in 2013 (Time 1) or 2017/2019 (Time 2). Surveys assessed parents' analgesic trade-off preference (-12 or risk-averse to +12 or pain relief preferent, scores around 0=ambivalent) and their hypothetical decisions to give a prescribed opioid to a child in pain.
resultsData from 847 parents were included (Time 1, n = 361; Time 2, n = 486). Parents at Time 2 were significantly more risk-averse compared with Time 1 (adj.β: -0.84 [95% CI: -1.09, -0.60]). Parents at Time 2 were more than twice as likely to be risk-averse or ambivalent (OR: 2.17 [95% CI: 1.62, 2.91]). There was a significant interaction effect of Time*Preference on parents' decision to give the opioid (adj. OR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.16]). At Time 2, parents who were ambivalent or risk-averse were less likely than those who preferred to relieve pain to administer the prescribed opioid (OR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.89]). In contrast, there was no association between the preference group and the opioid decision at Time 1.
conclusionFindings suggest that parents of children scheduled for painful surgery at our pediatric hospital have become more analgesic risk-averse during the past decade. Parents' analgesic trade-off preferences may influence their decisions to administer prescribed opioids after surgery, which may contribute to children's pain outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.