Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34008216›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2021

Mental health among pregnant women with COVID-19-related stressors and worries in the United States.

Jihong Liu, Peiyin Hung, Anthony J Alberg, Nicole L Hair, Kara M Whitaker, Jessica Simon, Sherri K Taylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jihong LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8685-3036
Peiyin HungRural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1529-0819
Anthony J AlbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nicole L HairDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8559-5717
Kara M WhitakerDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-4162
Jessica SimonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Sherri K TaylorMaternal Fetal Medicine, Prisma Health-University of South Carolina Medical Group, Columbia, SC, USA.
University of South Carolina · USPrisma Health · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Office of the Vice President for Research, University of South Carolina
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have evaluated whether pandemic-related stressors, worries, and social distancing have affected the mental health of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsData came from an online survey of United States pregnant women (n = 715), conducted in May 2020. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale were used to assess depressive symptoms, thoughts of self-harm, and moderate or severe anxiety. Multiple logistic regressions were used to examine the associations of COVID-19 experiences with mental health outcomes.

resultsParticipants were racially diverse. The prevalence of adverse mental health outcomes was 36% for probable depression, 20% for thoughts of self-harm, and 22% for anxiety. Women who reported family members dying from COVID-19 had four times higher odds of having thoughts of self-harm than women who did not experience family death. Depression was more prevalent among women who canceled or reduced medical appointments. Women were more likely to have worse mental health outcomes if they expressed worry about getting financial or emotional/social support, about their pregnancy, or about family or friends. Strict social distancing was positively associated with depression. A higher proportion of adults working from home was inversely associated with depression and thoughts of self-harm.

conclusionHigh percentages of pregnant women had symptoms of depression or anxiety, suggesting an urgent need to screen and treat mental health conditions among pregnant women during the pandemic. Pandemic-related risks and protective factors are relevant to developing tailored interventions to address the mental health of pregnant women during pandemic circumstances.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19pandemicperinatal anxietyperinatal depressionsuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID34008216
PMCPMC8239832
OpenAlexW3162000772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.