Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34008138›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Early Identification of Residual Disease After Neuroendocrine Tumor Resection Using a Liquid Biopsy Multigenomic mRNA Signature (NETest).

Irvin M Modlin, Mark Kidd, Kjell Oberg, Massimo Falconi, Pier Luigi Filosso, Andrea Frilling, Anna Malczewska, Ronald Salem, Christos Toumpanakis, Faidon-Marios Laskaratos and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. PET/CT and PET/MRI in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Induction therapy withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Irvin M ModlinYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. imodlin@irvinmodlin.com.
Mark KiddWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Kjell ObergUniversity Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Massimo FalconiIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Pier Luigi FilossoUniversity of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Andrea FrillingImperial College London, London, UK.
Anna MalczewskaMedical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Ronald SalemYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Christos ToumpanakisRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Faidon-Marios LaskaratosRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Stefano PartelliIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Matteo RoffinellaUniversity of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Claudia von ArxImperial College London, London, UK.
Beata Kos KudlaMedical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Lisa BodeiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ignat A DrozdovWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Alexandra KitzWren Laboratories, Branford, CT, USA.
Wren Laboratories (United States) · USImperial College London · GBMedical University of Silesia · PLThe Royal Free Hospital · GBYale University · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San RaffaeleMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgery is the only cure for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), with R0 resection being critical for successful tumor removal. Early detection of residual disease is key for optimal management, but both imaging and current biomarkers are ineffective post-surgery. NETest, a multigene blood biomarker, identifies NETs with >90% accuracy. We hypothesized that surgery would decrease NETest levels and that elevated scores post-surgery would predict recurrence.

methodsThis was a multicenter evaluation of surgically treated primary NETs (n = 153). Blood sampling was performed at day 0 and postoperative day (POD) 30. Follow-up included computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI), and messenger RNA (mRNA) quantification was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; NETest score: 0-100; normal ≤20). Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), as appropriate. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

resultsThe NET cohort (n = 153) included 57 patients with pancreatic cancer, 62 patients with small bowel cancer, 27 patients with lung cancer, 4 patients with duodenal cancer, and 3 patients with gastric cancer, while the surgical cohort comprised patients with R0 (n = 102) and R1 and R2 (n = 51) resection. The mean follow-up time was 14 months (range 3-68). The NETest was positive in 153/153 (100%) samples preoperatively (mean levels of 68 ± 28). In the R0 cohort, POD30 levels decreased from 62 ± 28 to 22 ± 20 (p < 0.0001), but remained elevated in 30% (31/102) of patients: 28% lung, 29% pancreas, 27% small bowel, and 33% gastric. By 18 months, 25/31 (81%) patients with a POD30 NETest >20 had image-identifiable recurrence. An NETest score of >20 predicted recurrence with 100% sensitivity and correlated with residual disease (Chi-square 17.1, p < 0.0001). AUROC analysis identified an AUC of 0.97 (p < 0.0001) for recurrence-prediction. In the R1 (n = 29) and R2 (n = 22) cohorts, the score decreased (R1: 74 ± 28 to 45 ± 24, p = 0.0012; R2: 72 ± 24 to 60 ± 28, p = non-significant). At POD30, 100% of NETest scores were elevated despite surgery (p < 0.0001).

conclusionThe preoperative NETest accurately identified all NETs (100%). All resections decreased NETest levels and a POD30 NETest score >20 predicted radiologically recurrent disease with 94% accuracy and 100% sensitivity. R0 resection appears to be ineffective in approximately 30% of patients. NET mRNA blood levels provide early objective genomic identification of residual disease and may facilitate management.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNeuroendocrine TumorsHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRNA, MessengerBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID34008138
OpenAlexW3161806942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.