ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021
Early Identification of Residual Disease After Neuroendocrine Tumor Resection Using a Liquid Biopsy Multigenomic mRNA Signature (NETest).
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Value of a 51-Neuroendocrine Tumor-Specific Gene Signature (NETest 2.0) for Management of Pancreatic and Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Study in a Consecutive Cohort of 82 Patients Considered for Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Surgical Approach to Liver Metastasis from Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the Era of Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- NETest® 2.0-A decade of innovation in neuroendocrine tumor diagnostics.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Review
- PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- An Overview of Circulating Biomarkers in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Clinical Guide.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The uprise of RNA biology in neuroendocrine neoplasms: altered splicing and RNA species unveil translational opportunities.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023Review
- An Insight on Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Based on Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Characteristics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- PET/CT and PET/MRI in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Review
- Comprehensive Clinical Analysis of Gallbladder Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Large-Volume Multicenter Study During One Decade.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- [Modern molecular and imaging diagnostics in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Induction therapy withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Role of chromogranin A-derived fragments after resection of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022Article
- Delayed processing of blood samples impairs the accuracy of mRNA-based biomarkers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Biomarkers in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Cancers · 2022Review
- A novel liquid biopsy (NETest) identifies paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas with high accuracy.Endocrine-related cancer · 2021Article
- Biomarkers in Small Intestine NETs and Carcinoid Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Biology · 2021Review
- Clinical Approach to Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Associated With Ovarian Teratoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgery is the only cure for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), with R0 resection being critical for successful tumor removal. Early detection of residual disease is key for optimal management, but both imaging and current biomarkers are ineffective post-surgery. NETest, a multigene blood biomarker, identifies NETs with >90% accuracy. We hypothesized that surgery would decrease NETest levels and that elevated scores post-surgery would predict recurrence.
methodsThis was a multicenter evaluation of surgically treated primary NETs (n = 153). Blood sampling was performed at day 0 and postoperative day (POD) 30. Follow-up included computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI), and messenger RNA (mRNA) quantification was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; NETest score: 0-100; normal ≤20). Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), as appropriate. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
resultsThe NET cohort (n = 153) included 57 patients with pancreatic cancer, 62 patients with small bowel cancer, 27 patients with lung cancer, 4 patients with duodenal cancer, and 3 patients with gastric cancer, while the surgical cohort comprised patients with R0 (n = 102) and R1 and R2 (n = 51) resection. The mean follow-up time was 14 months (range 3-68). The NETest was positive in 153/153 (100%) samples preoperatively (mean levels of 68 ± 28). In the R0 cohort, POD30 levels decreased from 62 ± 28 to 22 ± 20 (p < 0.0001), but remained elevated in 30% (31/102) of patients: 28% lung, 29% pancreas, 27% small bowel, and 33% gastric. By 18 months, 25/31 (81%) patients with a POD30 NETest >20 had image-identifiable recurrence. An NETest score of >20 predicted recurrence with 100% sensitivity and correlated with residual disease (Chi-square 17.1, p < 0.0001). AUROC analysis identified an AUC of 0.97 (p < 0.0001) for recurrence-prediction. In the R1 (n = 29) and R2 (n = 22) cohorts, the score decreased (R1: 74 ± 28 to 45 ± 24, p = 0.0012; R2: 72 ± 24 to 60 ± 28, p = non-significant). At POD30, 100% of NETest scores were elevated despite surgery (p < 0.0001).
conclusionThe preoperative NETest accurately identified all NETs (100%). All resections decreased NETest levels and a POD30 NETest score >20 predicted radiologically recurrent disease with 94% accuracy and 100% sensitivity. R0 resection appears to be ineffective in approximately 30% of patients. NET mRNA blood levels provide early objective genomic identification of residual disease and may facilitate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.