Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34008124›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2021

Emerging point-of-care biosensors for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19: current progress, challenges, and future prospects.

Yousef Rasmi, Xiaokang Li, Johra Khan, Tugba Ozer, Jane Ru Choi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Two-Dimensional (2D) materials in the detection of SARS-CoV-2.Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Yousef RasmiDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, 5714783734, Urmia, Iran.
Xiaokang LiLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Agora Center, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Johra KhanDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, 11952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Tugba OzerDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Chemical-Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220, Istanbul, Turkey.
Jane Ru ChoiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. janeruchoi@gmail.com.
Ludwig Cancer Research · CHMajmaah University · SAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUrmia University of Medical SciencesYıldız Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is currently a serious global health threat. While conventional laboratory tests such as quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), serology tests, and chest computerized tomography (CT) scan allow diagnosis of COVID-19, these tests are time-consuming and laborious, and are limited in resource-limited settings or developing countries. Point-of-care (POC) biosensors such as chip-based and paper-based biosensors are typically rapid, portable, cost-effective, and user-friendly, which can be used for COVID-19 in remote settings. The escalating demand for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 presents a strong need for a timely and comprehensive review on the POC biosensors for COVID-19 that meet ASSURED criteria: Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and Robust, Equipment-free, and Deliverable to end users. In the present review, we discuss the importance of rapid and early diagnosis of COVID-19 and pathogenesis of COVID-19 along with the key diagnostic biomarkers. We critically review the most recent advances in POC biosensors which show great promise for the detection of COVID-19 based on three main categories: chip-based biosensors, paper-based biosensors, and other biosensors. We subsequently discuss the key benefits of these biosensors and their use for the detection of antigen, antibody, and viral nucleic acids. The commercial POC biosensors for COVID-19 are critically compared. Finally, we discuss the key challenges and future perspectives of developing emerging POC biosensors for COVID-19. This review would be very useful for guiding strategies for developing and commercializing rapid POC tests to manage the spread of infections.Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesPoint-of-Care SystemsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 TestingHumansSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralChip-based biosensorsCommercializationCOVID-19Diagnostic biomarkersPaper-based biosensorsPoint-of-care biosensors

Identifiers

PMID34008124
PMCPMC8130795
OpenAlexW3158611137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.