Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34008122›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2021

INSM1 Expression in Breast Neoplasms with Neuroedocrine Features.

Jasna Metovic, Isabella Castellano, Eleonora Marinelli, Simona Osella-Abate, Anna Sapino, Paola Cassoni, Mauro Papotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Primary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  7. Cancers · 2024
    Review
  8. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: diagnostic confusion and future perspectives.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
  9. INSM1 promotes breast carcinogenesis by regulating C-MYC.American journal of cancer research · 2023
    Article
  10. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: diagnostic agreement and impact on outcome.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasna MetovicDepartment of Oncology, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Isabella CastellanoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy. isabella.castellano@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9072-1615
Eleonora MarinelliDepartment of Oncology, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Simona Osella-AbateDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Anna SapinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Paola CassoniDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Mauro PapottiDepartment of Oncology, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the 2019 WHO classification of breast tumors, neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified into well-differentiated NE tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated NE carcinomas (NEC), while other breast cancers (BCs) of special and no special type with neuroendocrine (NE) features are not incorporated in this scheme anymore. We aimed to assess whether INSM1, a novel NE marker, could have a role in breast NEN subtyping. We selected 63 BCs operated from 2003 to 2018, classified as BCs with NE features, with available clinico-pathological data. Following 2019 WHO criteria, this cohort was reclassified into 37 NETs/NECs, the remaining 26 tumors representing solid-papillary (7), mucinous (7), and mixed type (12) carcinomas with NE differentiation. Chromogranin A (CGA) and synaptophysin (SYN) immunostains were reviewed, and INSM1 was tested by immunohistochemistry. Thirty CGA- and SYN-negative no special type BCs served as negative control. INSM1 was expressed in 52/63 cases of the whole cohort (82.54%). INSM1 positive and negative cases had no significantly different clinico-pathological characteristics. INSM1 expression was not significantly different between the newly reclassified NET/NEC group and other BCs with NE features. No immunoexpression was observed in control BCs. The sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 for the NE phenotype was 82.5% and 100%, respectively, compared to 61.9% and 100% for CGA, and 95.2 and 100% for SYN. In conclusion, INSM1 is as accurate as traditional NE biomarkers to identify NE differentiation in BC. In analogy to standard NE markers, INSM1 could not distinguish NET and NEC from the other BC histotypes with NE differentiation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryItalyMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRepressor ProteinsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorINSM1 protein, humanRepressor ProteinsBreast carcinomaHistotypeINSM1Neuroendocrine differentiation

Identifiers

PMID34008122
PMCPMC8608773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.