ArticleEndocrine pathology2021
INSM1 Expression in Breast Neoplasms with Neuroedocrine Features.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of INSM1 expression in the diagnostic work-up of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with special reference to the differential diagnosis with neuroendocrine tumor.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Regulatory interplay of cyclin D1 and INSM1 in suppressing INSL6 expression: Implications for breast cancer biology.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) in gastric neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM-1) is a useful diagnostic marker for the evaluation of primary thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 27 cases.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Primary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Review
- Review
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: diagnostic confusion and future perspectives.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Article
- INSM1 promotes breast carcinogenesis by regulating C-MYC.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: diagnostic agreement and impact on outcome.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Observational
- Expression of novel neuroendocrine markers in breast carcinomas: a study of INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3.Human pathology · 2022Article
- Immunohistochemical analyses of the expression profiles of INSM1, ATRX, DAXX and DLL3 in solid papillary carcinomas of the breast.Oncology letters · 2022Article
- Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: The Latest WHO Classification and Review of the Literature.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the 2019 WHO classification of breast tumors, neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are classified into well-differentiated NE tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated NE carcinomas (NEC), while other breast cancers (BCs) of special and no special type with neuroendocrine (NE) features are not incorporated in this scheme anymore. We aimed to assess whether INSM1, a novel NE marker, could have a role in breast NEN subtyping. We selected 63 BCs operated from 2003 to 2018, classified as BCs with NE features, with available clinico-pathological data. Following 2019 WHO criteria, this cohort was reclassified into 37 NETs/NECs, the remaining 26 tumors representing solid-papillary (7), mucinous (7), and mixed type (12) carcinomas with NE differentiation. Chromogranin A (CGA) and synaptophysin (SYN) immunostains were reviewed, and INSM1 was tested by immunohistochemistry. Thirty CGA- and SYN-negative no special type BCs served as negative control. INSM1 was expressed in 52/63 cases of the whole cohort (82.54%). INSM1 positive and negative cases had no significantly different clinico-pathological characteristics. INSM1 expression was not significantly different between the newly reclassified NET/NEC group and other BCs with NE features. No immunoexpression was observed in control BCs. The sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 for the NE phenotype was 82.5% and 100%, respectively, compared to 61.9% and 100% for CGA, and 95.2 and 100% for SYN. In conclusion, INSM1 is as accurate as traditional NE biomarkers to identify NE differentiation in BC. In analogy to standard NE markers, INSM1 could not distinguish NET and NEC from the other BC histotypes with NE differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.