Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34008095›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Recognizing Indigenous peoples' and local communities' rights and agency in the post-2020 Biodiversity Agenda.

Victoria Reyes-García, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Yildiz Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Petra Benyei, Rainer W Bussmann, Sara K Diamond, David García-Del-Amo, Sara Guadilla-Sáez, Natalia Hanazaki, Nicolas Kosoy and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Indigenous peoples and local community reports of climate change impacts on biodiversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers of conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Reflections on the future of European ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Advancing social impact assessments for more effective and equitable conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biocultural vulnerability exposes threats of culturally important species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  19. Biocultural aspects of species extinctions.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Victoria Reyes-GarcíaInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain. victoria.reyes@uab.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-8055
Álvaro Fernández-LlamazaresHelsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, (Viikinkaari 1), 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Yildiz Aumeeruddy-ThomasCentre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, University Montpellier, CNRS, CEFE, UMR 5175, 1919, Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier, France.
Petra BenyeiInstitut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Carrer de les columnes, s/n. Z-building (ICTA-ICP), Bellaterra Campus, Cerdanyola del Valles, Bellatera, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Rainer W BussmannDepartment of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany and Bakuriani Alpine Botanical Garden, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Sara K DiamondDepartment of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas, Austin, USA.
David García-Del-AmoInstitut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Carrer de les columnes, s/n. Z-building (ICTA-ICP), Bellaterra Campus, Cerdanyola del Valles, Bellatera, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Sara Guadilla-SáezIndependent Researcher, Barcelona, Spain.
Natalia HanazakiDepartamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, ECZ/CCB/UFSC, Campus Trindade s/n, Florianópolis, SC, 88010-970, Brazil.
Nicolas KosoyFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill School of Environment, McGill University, Macdonald Stewart Building, MS3-037, Macdonald Campus, Ste. Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, H9X 3V9, Canada.
Margarita LavidesEarth Law Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ana C LuzISEG- Lisbon School of Economics & Management, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pamela McElweeDepartment of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Vicky J MeretskyO'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Teresa NewberryDepartment of Science, Tohono O'odham Community College, Sells, 1830 E. Broadway, Ste 124-202, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Zsolt MolnárCentre for Ecological Research, ELKH, Alkotmány u. 2-4, Vácrátót, 2163, Hungary.
Isabel Ruiz-MallénInternet Interdisciplinary Institute, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Av. Friedrich Gauss, 5, Castelldefels, 08860, Barcelona, Spain.
Matthieu SalpeteurPatrimoines Locaux, Environnement et Globalisation (UMR 208 PALOC), IRD, MNHN, French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), 57 rue Cuvier, CP 51, 75231, Paris Cedex 05, France.
Felice S WyndhamSchool of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Francisco Zorondo-RodriguezDepartamento de Gestión Agraria, Facultad Tecnológica, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Eduardo S BrondizioDepartment of Anthropology, Indiana University Bloomington, 702 E. Kirkwood Ave. Student building 130, Bloomington, IN, 47401, USA.

Funding

European Research Council 771056-LICCI-ERC-2017-COGMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades CEX2019-000940-M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity is defining the goals that will frame future global biodiversity policy in a context of rapid biodiversity decline and under pressure to make transformative change. Drawing on the work of Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars, we argue that transformative change requires the foregrounding of Indigenous peoples' and local communities' rights and agency in biodiversity policy. We support this argument with four key points. First, Indigenous peoples and local communities hold knowledge essential for setting realistic and effective biodiversity targets that simultaneously improve local livelihoods. Second, Indigenous peoples' conceptualizations of nature sustain and manifest CBD's 2050 vision of "Living in harmony with nature." Third, Indigenous peoples' and local communities' participation in biodiversity policy contributes to the recognition of human and Indigenous peoples' rights. And fourth, engagement in biodiversity policy is essential for Indigenous peoples and local communities to be able to exercise their recognized rights to territories and resources.

Indexed as

BiodiversityIndigenous PeoplesHumansBiodiversity policyConvention on Biological DiversityIndigenous and local knowledgeNature’s valuesRight-based approach

Identifiers

PMID34008095
PMCPMC8651947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.