Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34008090›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

The smartphone as a tool to screen for scoliosis, applicable by everyone.

H M van West, J Herfkens, J P H J Rutges, M Reijman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The ScolioscoopEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cobb angle estimation without X-ray using angle of trunk rotation and characteristics of unpredictable cases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H M van WestDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Room NC-414, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. h.vanwest@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-4303
J HerfkensDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Room NC-414, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J P H J RutgesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Room NC-414, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9452-415X
M ReijmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Room NC-414, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE (MAIN PURPOSES AND RESEARCH QUESTION): The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy and precision of the smartphone with application and casing (Scolioscreen) compared to the Scoliometer.

methodsThe Axial Trunk Rotation (ATR) was measured in adolescent scoliosis patients visiting the outpatient clinic while performing the Adam Forward Bending Test. The Scolioscreen measurements were performed by the orthopedic surgeon and a parent. They were compared to the measurement with the Scoliometer by the orthopedic surgeon, the gold standard. The accuracy was determined with the Pearson's correlation coefficient, and precision was determined by assessing the intra- and inter-variability with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsFifty patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (44 girls) were included with a mean age of 14.1 years and a mean Cobb angle of 38.5°. The accuracy of both the parents and orthopedic surgeon was excellent with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.92 and 0.97, respectively. All the ICC's, both intra- and inter-observer, were over 0.92 demonstrating excellent precision.

conclusionThis study confirms the accuracy and precision of the Scolioscreen when measuring the ATR on patients with AIS. Therefore, the Scoliometer can be replaced by the more easily available Scolioscreen which can be used by both physician and parents.

Indexed as

KyphosisScoliosisAdolescentFemaleHumansOrthopedic EquipmentSmartphoneTorsoAdolescentScoliosisScreeningSmartphoneTool

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.