Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007887›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2020

Impact through engagement: Co-production of administrative data research and the approach of the Administrative Data Research Centre Northern Ireland.

Elizabeth Nelson, Frances Burns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient Roles and Patient Knowledge in Learning Health Systems.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth NelsonAdministrative Data Research Centre Northern Ireland (ADRC NI), Ulster University.
Frances BurnsAdministrative Data Research Centre Northern Ireland (ADRC NI), Queen's University Belfast.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Administrative Data Research Centre Northern Ireland (ADRC NI) is a research partnership between Queen's University Belfast and Ulster University to facilitate access to linked administrative data for research purposes for public benefit and for evidence-based policy development. This requires a social licence extended by publics which is maintained by a robust approach to engagement and involvement. APPROACH: Public engagement is central to the ADRC NI approach to research. Research impact is pursued and secured through robust engagement and a model that moves towards co-production of research with publics and key stakeholders. This is done by focusing on DISCUSSION: While there are strengths and limitations to the ADRC NI approach, examples of successful partnerships and clear pathways to impact demonstrate its utility and ability to amplify the positive impact of administrative data research. Working with publics as data use becomes more ubiquitous in a post-COVID-19 world will become more critical. ADRC NI's model is a potential way forward.

Indexed as

administrative datacommunity researchco-productiondata subjectsnorthern irelandpublic engagementpublic involvementresearch for policyresearch impactsocial license

Identifiers

PMID34007887
PMCPMC8104064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.