ArticleCureus2021
Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized External Auditory Canal Carcinomas: Report of Four Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
External auditory canal carcinoma (EACC) is sometimes diagnosed at an early stage because it arises superficially in the ear canal and may cause ear obstruction symptoms early. In addition, in the early stage of EACCs, involvement of lymph nodes or distant metastases are reported less frequently. And so, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) concentrating high-dose radiation on the primary tumor may be an effective option. The aim of this study is to evaluate the preliminary results of upfront SRT for early-stage localized EACCs. Four cases (four females, 84 to 98 years old) with EACC of N0M0 (=no lymph node involvement and no distant metastasis) were treated. All four tumors (0.30 - 11.1 ml in volume) were diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma histologically. A total dose of 24 - 33 Gy in 3 - 5 fractions (D95 [dose delivered to 95% of the target volume]=100% dose) was delivered by SRT using CyberKnife. All four cases were alive at the end of the follow-up period of 19 to 106 months. In three cases (tumor volume, 0.3 - 3.5 ml) the treated tumors had regressed or disappeared by the end of the follow-up period of 106, 28, and 19 months respectively. In the remaining one case, the treated tumor (11.1 ml) regrew and cervical lymph node metastasis occurred, and both were treated with SRT again 6 months and 20 months after the initial SRT respectively. The tumors were still stable at 39 months after the initial SRT. In conclusion, in three cases the small tumors had regressed or disappeared without lymph node involvement or distant metastasis. In the remaining case, additional SRT was performed for recurrent tumors, after which the patient's condition remained stable. SRT may be an effective option for early-stage EACCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.