Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007681›Full record

ArticleInnovations in pharmacy2021

Identifying Potential High-Risk Medication Errors Using Telepharmacy and a Web-Based Survey Tool.

Nishat Afreen, Eimeira Padilla-Tolentino, Brandy McGinnis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06108674 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Telepharmacy on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Arterial Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06108674 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Telepharmacy on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Arterial Hypertension: Celeste Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of BahiaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled194ConditionsHypertensionArmsPharmaceutical care via telepharmacy and usual care, Pharmaceutical care in-person and usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nishat AfreenPharmacy Intern, PharmD Candidate 2021, University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, and Pharmacy Technician, Ascension Seton Department of Pharmacy.
Eimeira Padilla-TolentinoAscension Texas Department of Research, and Clinical Instructor, University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy.
Brandy McGinnisArea Director of Continuity of Care, Ascension Texas Department of Pharmacy, and Clinical Instructor, University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

introductionObtaining patient medication histories during emergency department (ED) admissions is an important step towards identifying potential errors that could otherwise remain in the patient's active medication list. This is a descriptive report of a standardized, electronic data collection tool created to document potential medication errors in patients receiving high-risk medications during ED admissions. MATERIALS AND

methodsTrained pharmacy technicians completed a survey following medication history collection using a secure web platform called REDCap®. Data collected included patient-specific information, the number and type of high-risk medications, and potential medication errors identified in the collection process.

resultsDuring a pilot period of April 2019 to October 2020, 191 patient records were completed using the survey tool. Out of a total of 1088 medications recorded, 41% were considered high-risk medications. 42% of potential medication errors were classified as high-risk medication errors. Results from this survey tool demonstrated that 58% of high-risk medication orders could potentially result in a medication error that can be carried through patient admission and discharge. DISCUSSION: Accurate medication history and transitions of care can significantly impact patient quality of life. The cost of addressing a medication related-adverse event is also substantial. Based on published reports, annual gross savings to a hospital is estimated to be $4532 per harmful error in 2020, after adjusting for inflation. This equated to approximately $1,182,852 in estimated savings for Ascension Texas in 18 months. Nationwide, preventing potential medication errors in an outpatient setting can save on average $3.5 billion per year.

conclusionThis web-based survey tool has improved the quality and efficiency of potential error identification during medication history collection by pharmacy technicians. This information can be easily retrieved and aid in discussions regarding medication reconciliation at the leadership level and impact patient treatment outcomes by developing virtual processes that may result in fewer medication related events.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHigh-risk medication errorsHigh-risk medicationsMedication errorsPharmacyTelehealthTelepharmacyWeb-based

Identifiers

PMID34007681
PMCPMC8102974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.