Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007619›Full record

ArticleInnovations in pharmacy2020

Hospital and Community Pharmacists' Views of and Perspectives on the Establishment of an Intraprofessional Collaboration in the Transition of Care for Newly Discharged Patients.

Laura V J Lech, Gitte R Husted, Anna Birna Almarsdottír, Trine R H Andersen, Charlotte Rossing, Lotte S Nørgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Managing adherence, exposure, and toxicity in oral anticancer therapies.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Assessing intradisciplinary pharmacy communication related to transitions of care.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura V J LechThe Social and Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Gitte R HustedPharmakon, The Danish College of Pharmacy Practice.
Anna Birna AlmarsdottírThe Social and Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Trine R H AndersenRegion Zealand Hospital Pharmacy.
Charlotte RossingPharmakon, The Danish College of Pharmacy Practice.
Lotte S NørgaardThe Social and Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital and community pharmacists are increasingly involved in patients' medication interventions related to the transition of care from the hospital to a patient's home. These interventions may enable pharmacists to collaborate across healthcare sector boundaries. However, little is known about pharmacists' views on intraprofessional collaboration across healthcare sectors and what affects the establishment of such collaboration.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to understand the views and perspectives of hospital pharmacists (HPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) on establishing an intraprofessional collaboration in relation to newly discharging patients.

methodsJoint focus group interviews with HPs and CPs in the Zealand region of Denmark were conducted. The HPs were employed at the only hospital pharmacy in the region (Region Zealand Hospital Pharmacy). Five HPs and six CPs participated in two focus groups. The focus groups were analyzed using theoretical thematic analysis.

resultsThree themes and seven subthemes were identified. The first theme, "Context", was divided into two subthemes: "Prioritization of new tasks in the intraprofessional collaboration" and "The lack of insight into the patient's hospital stay". The second theme, "The hospital physicians and GPs as the focal points for the HPs' and CPs' work", was divided into three subthemes: "The limitation of the CPs and HPs based on current roles and organizations", "Lack of regular access to the physician gives the patients more responsibility" and "Lack of support from the GPs for the work conducted by HPs and CPs". The last theme, "Individuals", had two subthemes: "The motivation for working intraprofessionally" and "CPs' hesitancy towards the new tasks in the intraprofessional collaboration".

conclusionBoth HPs and CPs are highly influenced by their work context in regard to establishing a new intraprofessional collaboration. Limited resources for intraprofessional collaboration should be taken into account. Likewise, the collaboration should fit into daily routines, which may eliminate hesitancy towards new forms of collaboration and tasks shared between HPs and CPs. The physician was identified as an important key professional, since the work tasks of both HPs and CPs depend on the physician, which in turn limits the capability and success of solely intraprofessional collaboration.

Indexed as

community pharmacyhospital dischargeHospital pharmacyintraprofessional collaborationtransition of care

Identifiers

PMID34007619
PMCPMC8075132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.