Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007584›Full record

ArticleInnovations in pharmacy2019

Factors Influencing Prescribing Perceived Utility of Drugs: Experiences from Iraqi Kurdistan.

Deldar Morad Abdulah, Karwan Ali Perot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deldar Morad AbdulahAdult Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Duhok Iraq.
Karwan Ali PerotSchool of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand and Kurdistan Business School, University of Kurdistan- Hewler, Iraqi Kurdistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPharmaceutical expenditures have increased dramatically in most developed and developing countries in recent decades. Healthcare system policymakers have expressed concerns about the inappropriate, irrational, or harmful prescribing of drugs.

objectivesThe attitudes of physicians towards prescribing generic drugs and predictors of perceived utility of drugs were investigated in the present study.

methodsIn this cross-sectional research, 77 physicians at different levels of job hierarchies, working in various public sector shifts, were recruited to participate in a survey of their attitudes toward prescribing generic drugs in Iraqi Kurdistan in 2018. The doctors were located in a general, an emergency, and a pediatric hospital. A self-administered structured questionnaire was designed based on the extended technology acceptance model for product use (TETPU).

resultsThe doctors agreed that drugs should be prescribed according to their utility for patients (median [M] = 5.0; interquartile range [IQR] = 2.9). Most of the physicians mentioned that they prescribed drugs according to the patients' needs (75.0%), evaluation of the availability of alternatives (69.0%) and consumer perceptions of a price (69.0%). The analysis showed that (1) the importance of physicians' perceptions and their recognition of patients' need achievement (P=.012), (2) the physicians' recognition of the actual use of drugs by consumers (P=.030) and (3) being male (p=.009) were associated with perceptions of drug utility.

conclusionsThe study's results suggest that perceived drug utility in prescription writing is associated with physicians' perceptions of need achievement and attitudes toward how patients actually use medicines.

Indexed as

doctors’ attitudesdrug administrationperceived utilityPrescription

Identifiers

PMID34007584
PMCPMC8051892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.