Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007557›Full record

ArticleInnovations in pharmacy2019

Assessment of Patient Education about Statin Therapy on Quality Measures and Knowledge in an Independent Community Pharmacy.

Sean W Clark, Gretchen K Garofoli, Betsy M Elswick

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean W ClarkPGY-1 Community-Based Pharmacy Resident at West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Waterfront Family Pharmacy.
Gretchen K GarofoliAssociate Professor at West Virginia School of Pharmacy in the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Waterfront Family Pharmacy.
Betsy M ElswickAssociate Professor and Residency Program Director, PGY-1 Community-Based Residency Program, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy.
West Virginia University · USAmerican Association of Colleges of Pharmacy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives were to 1) assess the possible impact of face-to-face patient education on Electronic Quality Improvement Platform for Plans and Pharmacies (EQuIPP) performance scores, 2) determine if face-to-face patient education increased overall knowledge and number of identified patients on statin therapy, and 3) identify barriers to statin therapy in targeted patients with diabetes.

designParticipants received an anonymous survey tool collecting demographic data and assessing barriers, baseline knowledge, and perceptions about statin therapy. Following the initial survey, participants received education from the pharmacist describing the risks and benefits of statin therapy and were given a supplemental pamphlet. A second post-education survey tool was given to assess posteducation knowledge and perceptions. At the end of the study period, investigators assessed the number of participants started on statin therapy and calculated the predicted percentage change in EQuIPP score. SETTING AND

participantsThis study was conducted at Waterfront Family Pharmacy in Morgantown, West Virginia from December 2017 until April 2018. Participants were included if aged 40 to 75, received at least two fills of a diabetes medication at the pharmacy in the last year, had not taking a statin within a year prior to participating in the study, and could read and write in English. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the predicted percentage change in the "Statin Use in Diabetes" EQuIPP Score. Secondary measures included post-educational knowledge and perceptions of statin therapy.

resultsDuring the study period, 10 participants completed the surveys and educational intervention. The predicted change in "Statin Use in Diabetes" EQuIPP score was an increase from 75% to 76.9% (+ 1.9%). Prior to the educational intervention, none of the participants could identify a benefit of statin therapy aside from lowering cholesterol. After the intervention, 80% of participants could identify at least one additional benefit of statin therapy. Before the intervention, 30% of participants stated they would consider taking a statin, which increased to 80% following the pharmacist-led education. Lastly, no participants felt they needed to be on statin therapy prior to the intervention. Following the intervention, 40% stated they believed they were candidates for statin therapy.

conclusionsPatients are willing to receive education from pharmacists about their medications and are receptive to general recommendations. A common modifiable barrier to statin therapy is patient knowledge, emphasizing the importance of pharmacistprovided education. Education about statin therapy may also increase EQuIPP scores in an independent community pharmacy, leading to better outcomes for patients and improvement of common performance measures. Overall, it appears patients require more education about statin therapy and the benefit these drugs can provide aside from their cholesterol lowering properties. Pharmacistprovided education regarding statins in patients with diabetes can increase performance measures monitored by third party payers.

Indexed as

DiabetesEducationQuality MeasuresStatin

Identifiers

PMID34007557
PMCPMC7592873
OpenAlexW2946374614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.