Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007549›Full record

ArticleInnovations in pharmacy2019

The Effect of Zero Copayments on Medication Adherence in a Community Pharmacy Setting.

Melissa Jimenez, Goar Alvarez, Albert Wertheimer, Leanne Lai, Leroy Koh, Dainelys Martinez, Bushra Hijazi, Mark Weinstein

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Melissa JimenezNova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Goar AlvarezNova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Albert WertheimerNova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Leanne LaiNova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Leroy KohHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Dainelys MartinezNova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
Bushra HijaziJordan University of Science and Technology College of Clinical Pharmacy, Irbid, Jordan.
Mark WeinsteinIndependent Colleges and Universities Benefits Association, Orlando, FL.
Nova Southeastern University · USIndependent Colleges and Universities of Florida · USJordan University of Science and Technology · JOMethodist Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescription medication copayments can be a financial burden to many patients. When patients cannot afford their medications, they may become nonadherent, and as a result, this can lead to an increase in chronic disease complications and healthcare costs.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine if zero copayments have an effect on medication adherence in a community pharmacy.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study examined the prescription refill records of patients who filled specific generic medications for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 2016 at the NSU Clinic Pharmacy. The adherence rates of patients with zero copayments were compared to the adherence rates of patients with copayments greater than $0. Adherence was determined by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC). Patients were considered adherent if their PDC was greater than or equal to 80%.

resultsGERD patients with no copayments had average PDC ratios of 87.4% and were statistically significantly more adherent than GERD patients with copayments, who had average PDC ratios of 76.7% (P = 0.042). Hyperlipidemia and hypertension patients with no copayments had average PDC ratios of 89.3% and 90.3%, respectively, and those with copayments had PDC ratios of 85.3% (P = 0.314) and 87.9% (P = 0.534).

conclusionOverall, patients with $0 copayments had higher adherence rates than patients with copayments greater than $0. GERD patients with no copayments were significantly more adherent than GERD patients with copayments. However, no statistically significant difference was found between patients with or without copayments in the hyperlipidemia and hypertension cohorts. Further studies are recommended to analyze additional factors that may influence medication adherence.

Identifiers

PMID34007549
PMCPMC7592865
OpenAlexW2948220548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.