Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007517›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2021

Highly efficient and automated extraction of DNA from human remains using a modified EZ1 protocol.

Anna Barbaro, Sasha Samar, Giacomo Falcone, Angelo La Marca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DNA and protein analyses of hair in forensic genetics.International journal of legal medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna BarbaroDepartment of Forensic Genetics, Studio Indagini Mediche E Forensi (SIMEF), Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6564-5323
Sasha SamarDepartment of Forensic Genetics, Studio Indagini Mediche E Forensi (SIMEF), Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Giacomo FalconeDepartment of Forensic Genetics, Studio Indagini Mediche E Forensi (SIMEF), Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Angelo La MarcaDepartment of Forensic Genetics, Studio Indagini Mediche E Forensi (SIMEF), Reggio Calabria, Italy.
University of Reggio Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bones and teeth often represent the only sources of DNA available for identifying human remains. DNA in bones and teeth is generally better preserved than that in soft tissues because of the presence of hard connective tissue with a high level of calcium. Because of the extensive mineralisation, the choice of an efficient DNA extraction procedure is important to minimise the sampling of a high level of minerals and to remove polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitors. Some protocols are available for DNA extraction from bones and teeth as part of the Qiagen EZ1 DNA Investigator Kit using the EZ1 Advanced XL automated purification platform. To improve the efficiency of DNA extraction from skeletal remains, the present study focuses on a modification to these already available protocols. In this study, different bones and teeth collected between 1 and 50 years after death were subjected to DNA extraction using the standard EZ1 protocol, a supplementary protocol, and a modified protocol. The modified approach included a decalcification step, whereas the Qiagen protocols worked directly on non-decalcified powder. In all three procedures, 150 mg samples were used for DNA extraction. We evaluated the quantity of DNA recovered from samples, the presence of any PCR inhibitors co-extracted, the level of DNA degradation, the quality of short tandem repeat (STR) profiles, and the reproducibility of the modified procedure. When compared with the other protocols, the modified protocol resulted in the best recovery of DNA that was free of PCR inhibitors. Additionally, the STR profiles were reliable and of high quality. In our opinion, the decalcification step increases DNA recovery by softening tissues, which allows lysis solutions to act more effectively. Furthermore, the use of two lysis solutions and the variation added to the EZ1 purification step allow for DNA recovery with quality and quantity superior to those of the previously available Qiagen-based protocols. These findings may be helpful solutions to the problems commonly encountered when dealing with difficult samples, such as bones and teeth.Key pointsBones and teeth often represent the only sources of DNA for identifying human remains.The choice of an efficient DNA extraction procedure is important for maximizing DNA recovery and removing PCR inhibitors.This study focuses on modifications to the previously available Qiagen-based protocols.The modified protocol enabled the best recovery of DNA, and both quality and quantity were superior to those of the previously available Qiagen-based protocols.The STR profiles obtained from samples extracted using the modified protocol were reliable and of high quality.

Indexed as

boneDNA extractionEZ1 automationforensic geneticsForensic sciencestooth

Identifiers

PMID34007517
PMCPMC8110185
OpenAlexW3124571622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.