Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007478›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa2021

Quality of individual and group level interventions for first-episode psychosis at the tertiary psychiatric hospital in Uganda.

Emmanuel K Mwesiga, Noeline Nakasujja, Lawrence Nankaba, Juliet Nakku, Seggane Musisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-world comprehensive care of people living with schizophrenia: recommendations across different settings and clinical stages.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emmanuel K MwesigaDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3512-7717
Noeline NakasujjaDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-4376
Lawrence NankabaButabika National Referral Mental Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-3441
Juliet NakkuButabika National Referral Mental Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-1102
Seggane MusisiDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-0000

Funding

NURTURE:Research Training and Mentoring Program for Career Development of Faculty at Makerere University College of Health SciencesD43TW010132 · FIC · MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SEWANKAMBO, NELSON K · 2015 to 2019
$4.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual and group level interventions have the largest effect on outcomes in patients with the first episode of psychosis. The quality of these individual and group level interventions provided to first-episode psychosis patients in Uganda is unclear.

aimTo determine the quality of the individual and group level interventions provided to first episode psychosis patients in Uganda.

settingThe study was performed at the only tertiary psychiatric hospital in Uganda.

methodsA retrospective chart review of recently discharged adult in-patients with the first episode of psychosis was performed. The proportion of participants who received different essential components for individual and group level interventions were calculated. From the different proportions, the quality of the services across the individual and group interventions was determined using the first-episode psychosis services fidelity scale (FEPS-FS). The FEPS-FS assigns a grade of 1-5 on a Likert scale depending on the proportion of patients who received the different components of the intervention. Twelve essential components across the individual and group interventions were assessed and their quality quantified.

resultsThe final sample included 156 first-episode psychosis patients. The median age was 27 years (inter-quartile range [IQR] [24-36]) and 55% of the participants were female. All 12 essential components had poor quality with the range of scores on the FEPS-FS between one and three. Only one essential component assessed (use of single antipsychotics) had moderate quality.

conclusionAmongst current services at the Butabika National Referral Mental Hospital in Uganda, the essential components for individual and group level interventions for psychotic disorders are of poor quality. Further studies are required on how the quality of these interventions can be improved.

Indexed as

early intervention servicesfirst episode psychosisgroup level interventionsindividual level interventionslow and middle income countrypublic healthservice provision

Identifiers

PMID34007478
PMCPMC8111614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.