Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007470›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2021

Building a framework for inclusion in health services research: Development of and pre-implementation faculty and staff attitudes toward the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) plan at Mayo Clinic.

Felicity T Enders, Elizabeth H Golembiewski, Laura M Pacheco-Spann, Megan Allyse, Michelle M Mielke, Joyce E Balls-Berry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An innovative DEI approach for emerging HIV investigators on Latino health.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Changing the face of academic medicine: an equity action plan for institutions.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Felicity T EndersDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Elizabeth H GolembiewskiDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1015-3935
Laura M Pacheco-SpannDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Megan AllyseDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michelle M MielkeDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joyce E Balls-BerryDepartment of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo mitigate the impact of racism, sexism, and other systemic biases, it is essential for organizations to develop strategies to address their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) climates. The objective of this formative evaluation was to assess Mayo Clinic Department of Health Sciences Research (HSR) faculty and staff perceptions toward a proposed departmental DEI plan and to explore findings by diversity and professional subgroups. MATERIALS AND

methodsKey plan components include recruitment and support for diverse individuals; training for all HSR employees and leaders; and a review system to capture diversity and inclusion feedback for leaders. Additional activities include building inclusion "nudges" into existing performance reviews. To assess pre-implementation beliefs about specific plan components, we polled attendees at a departmental staff meeting in July 2020.

resultsOverall, respondents ( DISCUSSION: Overall, HSR faculty and staff respondents conveyed support for the plan. However, some specific plan activities were perceived differently by members of certain diversity or professional subgroups.

conclusionThese findings present a DEI framework on which other institutions can build and point to future directions for how DEI activities may be differentially perceived by impacted faculty and staff.

Indexed as

academic medicineDiversityequityinclusionorganizational culture

Identifiers

PMID34007470
PMCPMC8111694
OpenAlexW3120447031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.