Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34007305›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Severity with fMRI Images Using Robust Multitask Feature Extraction Method and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN).

Morteza Amini, MirMohsen Pedram, AliReza Moradi, Mahshad Ouchani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Connectome-based biophysics models of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and prognosis.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Deep Learning-Based Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morteza AminiDepartment of Cognitive Modeling, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-9519
MirMohsen PedramDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0674-4428
AliReza MoradiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-6017
Mahshad OuchaniInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-6828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The automatic diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease plays an important role in human health, especially in its early stage. Because it is a neurodegenerative condition, Alzheimer's disease seems to have a long incubation period. Therefore, it is essential to analyze Alzheimer's symptoms at different stages. In this paper, the classification is done with several methods of machine learning consisting of

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseBrainComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDecision TreesDeep LearningDiscriminant AnalysisEarly DiagnosisFunctional NeuroimagingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental Status and Dementia TestsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID34007305
PMCPMC8100410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.