ArticleScientific reports2021
Bouncing behavior of sub-four minute milers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Biological and Race Strategy Characteristics Investigated in Elite Endurance Track Running: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Pooled it
- The Relationship Between Running Biomechanics and Running Economy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- The Biomechanical Signature of Elite Distance Running: A Matched Pairs Analysis Across Multiple Speeds.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- The effects of running shoe stack height on running style and stability during level running at different running speeds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Instrumenting Parkrun: Usefulness and Validity of Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Biomechanical, physiological and anthropometrical predictors of performance in recreational runners.PeerJ · 2024Observational
- Stride-to-stride variability and fluctuations at intensities around lactate threshold in distance runners.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Assessing spring-mass similarity in elite and recreational runners.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Injury and performance related biomechanical differences between recreational and collegiate runners.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Changes in Key Biomechanical Parameters According to the Expertise Level in Runners at Different Running Speeds.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A hierarchical clustering approach for examining potential risk factors for bone stress injury in runners.Journal of biomechanics · 2022Article
- Biomechanics of World-Class 800 m Women at the 2017 IAAF World Championships.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Augmented Cooper test: Biomechanical contributions to endurance performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Grizzlies and gazelles: Duty factor is an effective measure for categorizing running style in English Premier League soccer players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elite middle distance runners present as a unique population in which to explore biomechanical phenomena in relation to running speed, as their training and racing spans a broad spectrum of paces. However, there have been no comprehensive investigations of running mechanics across speeds within this population. Here, we used the spring-mass model of running to explore global mechanical behavior across speeds in these runners. Ten elite-level 1500 m and mile runners (mean 1500 m best: 3:37.3 ± 3.6 s; mile: 3:54.6 ± 3.9 s) and ten highly trained 1500 m and mile runners (mean 1500 m best: 4:07.6 ± 3.7 s; mile: 4:27.4 ± 4.1 s) ran on a treadmill at 10 speeds where temporal measures were recorded. Spatiotemporal and spring-mass characteristics and their corresponding variation were calculated within and across speeds. All spatiotemporal measures changed with speed in both groups, but the changes were less substantial in the elites. The elite runners ran with greater approximated vertical forces (+ 0.16 BW) and steeper impact angles (+ 3.1°) across speeds. Moreover, the elites ran with greater leg and vertical stiffnesses (+ 2.1 kN/m and + 3.6 kN/m) across speeds. Neither group changed leg stiffness with increasing speeds, but both groups increased vertical stiffness (1.6 kN/m per km/h), and the elite runners more so (further + 0.4 kN/m per km/h). The elite runners also demonstrated lower variability in their spatiotemporal behavior across speeds. Together, these findings suggested that elite middle distance runners may have distinct global mechanical patterns across running speeds, where they behave as stiffer, less variable spring-mass systems compared to highly trained, but sub-elite counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.