Observational studyScientific reports2021
Early bradycardia detection and therapeutic interventions in preterm infant monitoring.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative measures of autonomic cardiorespiratory maturation in preterm infants are associated with brain volumes at term age.Early human development · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric arrhythmias: current landscape, unique challenges, and translational perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Crying wolf, alarm safety and management in paediatrics: A scoping review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Caregivers' response to cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants in the NICU - A quantitative overview.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Observational
- Exploring Computational Techniques in Preprocessing Neonatal Physiological Signals for Detecting Adverse Outcomes: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Bradycardia May Decrease Cardiorespiratory Coupling in Preterm Infants.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of intraoperative hypoxemia for pediatric patients.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In very preterm infants, cardio-respiratory events and associated hypoxemia occurring during early postnatal life have been associated with risks of retinopathy, growth alteration and neurodevelopment impairment. These events are commonly detected by continuous cardio-respiratory monitoring in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), through the associated bradycardia. NICU nurse interventions are mainly triggered by these alarms. In this work, we acquired data from 52 preterm infants during NICU monitoring, in order to propose an early bradycardia detector which is based on a decentralized fusion of three detectors. The main objective is to improve automatic detection under real-life conditions without altering performance with respect to that of a monitor commonly used in NICU. We used heart rate lower than 80 bpm during at least 10 sec to define bradycardia. With this definition we observed a high rate of false alarms (64%) in real-life and that 29% of the relevant alarms were not followed by manual interventions. Concerning the proposed detection method, when compared to current monitors, it provided a significant decrease of the detection delay of 2.9 seconds, without alteration of the sensitivity (97.6% vs 95.2%) and false alarm rate (63.7% vs 64.1%). We expect that such an early detection will improve the response of the newborn to the intervention and allow for the development of new automatic therapeutic strategies which could complement manual intervention and decrease the sepsis risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.