Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34006889›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Rabbit as an animal model for the study of biological grafts in pelvic floor dysfunctions.

Marta Peró, Laura Casani, Cristina Castells-Sala, Maria Luisa Pérez, Esther Moga Naranjo, Oriol Juan-Babot, Leticia Alserawan De Lamo, Patricia López-Chicón, Anna Vilarrodona Serrat, Lina Badimon and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06404931 (Transvaginal Human Acellular Dermal Matrix and Sacrospinous Fixation for Anterior and Apical Prolapse Treatment in Patients With Hiatal Ballooning or Levator Ani Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06404931 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Transvaginal Human Acellular Dermal Matrix and Sacrospinous Fixation for Anterior and Apical Prolapse Treatment in Patients With Hiatal Ballooning or Levator Ani Injury: a Randomized Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Mutua de TerrassaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsProlapse, Female, Prolapse Genital, Prolapse UterovaginalArmsVaginal hysterectomy plus matrix reinforcement and sacrospinous fixation with Anchorsure® device, Vaginal hysterectomy plus anterior colporrhaphy, Vaginal hysterectomy plus sacrospinous fixation with Anchorsure® device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta PeróDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer Sant Quintí, 89, 08041, Barcelona, Spain. mpero@santpau.cat.
Laura CasaniResearch Institute of the Hospital de Sant Pau-IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina Castells-SalaBarcelona Tissue Bank, Banc de Sang i Teixits (BST), Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Luisa PérezBarcelona Tissue Bank, Banc de Sang i Teixits (BST), Barcelona, Spain.
Esther Moga NaranjoDepartment of Immunology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol Juan-BabotResearch Institute of the Hospital de Sant Pau-IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Leticia Alserawan De LamoDepartment of Immunology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Patricia López-ChicónBarcelona Tissue Bank, Banc de Sang i Teixits (BST), Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Vilarrodona SerratBarcelona Tissue Bank, Banc de Sang i Teixits (BST), Barcelona, Spain.
Lina BadimonResearch Institute of the Hospital de Sant Pau-IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol Porta RodaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer Sant Quintí, 89, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital de Sant Pau · ESBiomedical Research Institute · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESBanc de Sang i Teixits · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of the New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit for studying implanted biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery; and to compare the occurrence of graft-related complications of a commercial polypropylene (PP) mesh and new developed human dermal matrix implanted at vaginal and abdominal level. 20 white female NZW rabbits were randomized into two groups, experimental group (human acellular dermal matrices-hADM-graft) and control group (commercial PP graft). In each animal, grafts were surgically implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal wall and in the vaginal submucosa layer for 180 days. The graft segments were then removed and the surgical and clinical results were analyzed. The main surgical challenges during graft implantation were: (a) an adequate vaginal exposure while maintaining the integrity of the vaginal mucosa layer; (b) to keep aseptic conditions; (c) to locate and dissect the breast vein abdominal surgery; and (d) to withdraw blood samples from the ear artery. The most abnormal findings during the explant surgery were found in the PP group (33% of vaginal mesh extrusion) in comparison with the hADM group (0% of vaginal graft extrusion), p = 0.015. Interestingly, macroscopic observation showed that the integration of the vaginal grafts was more common in the hADM group (40%) than in the PP group, in which the vaginal mesh was identified in 100% of the animals (p = 0.014). The NZW rabbit is a good model for assessing materials to be used as grafts for pelvic reconstructive surgery and vaginal surgery. Animals are easily managed during the procedures, including surgical intervention and vaginal mucosa approach. Additionally, hADM is associated with fewer clinical complications, as well as better macroscopic tissue integration, compared to PP mesh.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDisease Models, AnimalFemalePelvic FloorRabbitsBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID34006889
PMCPMC8131625
OpenAlexW3160753016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.