Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34006644›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Old vaccines for new infections: Exploiting innate immunity to control COVID-19 and prevent future pandemics.

Konstantin Chumakov, Michael S Avidan, Christine S Benn, Stefano M Bertozzi, Lawrence Blatt, Angela Y Chang, Dean T Jamison, Shabaana A Khader, Shyam Kottilil, Mihai G Netea and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07527247 (Using AS01 Adjuvant to Improve Immune Response in Older Adults Through Trained Immunity), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07527247 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Using AS01 Adjuvant to Improve Immune Response in Older Adults Through Trained Immunity

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingapore General HospitalRan2025 to 2029Enrolled40ConditionsImmune System Responses and Trained Immunity After AS01 Administration, Healthy AdultArmsAS01 adjuvant (0.5 mL intramuscular), YF17D (Stamaril, Sanofi-Pasteur), Placebo (NaCl 09%, 0.5mL)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Konstantin ChumakovFood and Drug Administration Office of Vaccine Research and Review, Global Virus Network Center of Excellence, Silver Spring, MD 20993.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-6247
Michael S AvidanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO 63130.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-044X
Christine S BennDepartment of Clinical Research, Global Virus Network Center of Excellence, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6102-3810
Stefano M BertozziSchool of Public Health, Global Virus Network, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704.
Lawrence BlattAligos Therapeutics, Global Virus Network Center of Excellence, San Francisco, CA 94080.
Angela Y ChangDanish Institute for Advanced Study, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3947-3588
Dean T JamisonInstitute for Global Health Sciences, Global Virus Network, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Shabaana A KhaderDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-4982
Shyam KottililInstitute of Human Virology, Global Virus Network Center of Excellence, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Mihai G NeteaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Global Virus Network Center of Excellence, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annie SparrowDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029.ORCID 0000-0002-6302-9914
Robert C GalloInstitute of Human Virology, Global Virus Network Center of Excellence, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201; rgallo@ihv.umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3797-7910
Global Virus Network · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKWashington University in St. Louis · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unparalleled pursuit of vaccines to induce specific adaptive immunity, based on virus-neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses. Although several vaccines have been developed just a year after SARS-CoV-2 emerged in late 2019, global deployment will take months or even years. Meanwhile, the virus continues to take a severe toll on human life and exact substantial economic costs. Innate immunity is fundamental to mammalian host defense capacity to combat infections. Innate immune responses, triggered by a family of pattern recognition receptors, induce interferons and other cytokines and activate both myeloid and lymphoid immune cells to provide protection against a wide range of pathogens. Epidemiological and biological evidence suggests that the live-attenuated vaccines (LAV) targeting tuberculosis, measles, and polio induce protective innate immunity by a newly described form of immunological memory termed "trained immunity." An LAV designed to induce adaptive immunity targeting a particular pathogen may also induce innate immunity that mitigates other infectious diseases, including COVID-19, as well as future pandemic threats. Deployment of existing LAVs early in pandemics could complement the development of specific vaccines, bridging the protection gap until specific vaccines arrive. The broad protection induced by LAVs would not be compromised by potential antigenic drift (immune escape) that can render viruses resistant to specific vaccines. LAVs might offer an essential tool to "bend the pandemic curve," averting the exhaustion of public health resources and preventing needless deaths and may also have therapeutic benefits if used for postexposure prophylaxis of disease.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAdaptive ImmunityCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunity, HeterologousImmunologic MemoryPandemicsSARS-CoV-2VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesVaccines, Attenuatedinterferonnonspecific effects of live vaccinesSARS-CoV-2trained immunity

Identifiers

PMID34006644
PMCPMC8166166
OpenAlexW3162681080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.