Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34006563›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Implementation research for taking tobacco control policies to scale in India: a realist evaluation study protocol.

Pragati Bhaskar Hebbar, Vivek Dsouza, Upendra Bhojani, Onno Cp van Schayck, Giridhara R Babu, Gera Nagelhout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pragati Bhaskar HebbarInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India pragati@iphindia.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5410-4943
Vivek DsouzaInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Upendra BhojaniInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-6248
Onno Cp van SchayckDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Giridhara R BabuEpidemiology, IIPH-H, Bangalore campus, Associate Professor, Public Health Foundation of India, IIPH-H, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4370-8933
Gera NagelhoutDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/17/1/503338DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/17/1/503346Department of Biotechnology/Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/ CPHE/17/1/503338Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are ongoing policies and programs to reduce tobacco use and minimise the associated health burden in India. However, there are several challenges in practice leading to different outcomes across Indian states. Inadequate understanding of how national tobacco control policies achieve their results under varied circumstances obstruct the implementation and scaling up of effective strategies. This study is a realist evaluation using largely qualitative methods to understand the implementation process of India's tobacco control policies. It will do so by evaluating India's Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) and the National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP). The study aims to examine how, why, for whom and under which circumstances COTPA and NTCP are implemented in India. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A realist synthesis on implementation of tobacco control policies in low-income and middle-income countries is conducted. This is followed by qualitative data collection and analysis in three Indian states selected based on data from two rounds of the Global Adult Tobacco Survey. The study comprises of three steps (1): development of initial programme theories, (2) testing and refinement of initial programme theories and (3) testing and validation of refined programme theories. We will interview policy-makers, programme managers and implementers to identify facilitators and barriers of implementation. The purpose is to identify context-specific evidence-based strategies to gain insights into the implementation process of COTPA and NTCP. Further we aim to contribute to tobacco control research by establishing communities of practice to engage with cross-cutting issues. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Ethics Committee, at the Institute of Public Health (Bengaluru), has approved the protocol. Written informed consent forms will be obtained from all the participants. Dissemination has been planned for researchers, policy-makers and implementers as well as the public through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentation, webinars and social media updates. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020191541.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsHumansIndiaPublic HealthTobacco Usehealth policyprotocols & guidelinespublic health

Identifiers

PMID34006563
PMCPMC8130733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.