Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34006553›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Prospective bladder cancer infrastructure for experimental and observational research on bladder cancer: study protocol for the 'trials within cohorts' study ProBCI.

Anke Richters, Richard P Meijer, Niven Mehra, Joost L Boormans, Antoine G van der Heijden, Michiel S van der Heijden, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Katja K Aben

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04503577 (Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04503577 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure: an Infrastructure for Observational and Interventional Bladder Cancer Research (ProBCI)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorProspective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure FoundationRan2020 to 2041Enrolled3,600ConditionsBladder Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anke RichtersResearch and Development, The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands a.richters@iknl.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-1543
Richard P MeijerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niven MehraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joost L BoormansCancer Institute - Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Antoine G van der HeijdenUrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michiel S van der HeijdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Nederlands Kanker Instituut, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lambertus A KiemeneyDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Katja K AbenResearch and Development, The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA better understanding of the molecular profile of bladder tumours, the identification of novel therapeutic targets, and introduction of new drugs and has renewed research interest in the field of bladder cancer. We describe the design and setup of a Dutch Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure (ProBCI) as a means to stimulate and accelerate clinically meaningful experimental and observational research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ProBCI entails an open cohort of patients with bladder cancer in which the trials within cohorts (TwiCs) design can be embedded. Physicians in participating hospitals prospectively recruit invasive (≥T1) patients with bladder cancer on primary diagnosis for inclusion into the study. Extensive clinical data are collected and updated every 4 months, along with patient-reported outcomes and biomaterials. Informed consent includes participation in TwiCs studies and renewed contact for future studies. Consent for participation in questionnaires and molecular analyses that may yield incidental findings is optional. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Dutch ProBCI is a unique effort to construct a nation-wide cohort of patients with bladder cancer including clinical data, patient-reported outcomes and biomaterial, to facilitate observational and experimental research. Data and materials are available for other research groups on request through www.probci.nl. Ethics approval was obtained from METC Utrecht (reference: NL70207.041.19). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04503577.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesepidemiologyoncologyurological tumours

Identifiers

PMID34006553
PMCPMC8130738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.