Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34006548›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Direct and mediated effects of treatment context on low back pain outcome: a prospective cohort study.

Felicity Bishop, Miznah Al-Abbadey, Lisa Roberts, Hugh MacPherson, Beth Stuart, Dawn Carnes, Carol Fawkes, Lucy Yardley, Katherine Bradbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felicity BishopDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK F.L.Bishop@southampton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-6662
Miznah Al-AbbadeyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Lisa RobertsHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2662-6696
Hugh MacPhersonHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Beth StuartPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Dawn CarnesInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Carol FawkesInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Lucy YardleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Katherine BradburyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

20552 20552Versus Arthritis 20552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContextual components of treatment previously associated with patient outcomes include the environment, therapeutic relationship and expectancies. Questions remain about which components are most important, how they influence outcomes and comparative effects across treatment approaches. We aimed to identify significant and strong contextual predictors of patient outcomes, test for psychological mediators and compare effects across three treatment approaches.

designProspective cohort study with patient-reported and practitioner-reported questionnaire data (online or paper) collected at first consultation, 2 weeks and 3 months.

settingPhysiotherapy, osteopathy and acupuncture clinics throughout the UK.

participants166 practitioners (65 physiotherapists, 46 osteopaths, 55 acupuncturists) were recruited via their professional organisations. Practitioners recruited 960 adult patients seeking treatment for low back pain (LBP). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was back-related disability. Secondary outcomes were pain and well-being. Contextual components measured were: therapeutic alliance; patient satisfaction with appointment systems, access, facilities; patients' treatment beliefs including outcome expectancies; practitioners' attitudes to LBP and practitioners' patient-specific outcome expectancies. The hypothesised mediators measured were: patient self-efficacy for pain management; patient perceptions of LBP and psychosocial distress.

resultsAfter controlling for baseline and potential confounders, statistically significant predictors of reduced back-related disability were: all three dimensions of stronger therapeutic alliance (goal, task and bond); higher patient satisfaction with appointment systems; reduced patient-perceived treatment credibility and increased practitioner-rated outcome expectancies. Therapeutic alliance over task (η

conclusionsEnhancing contextual components in musculoskeletal healthcare could improve patient outcomes. Interventions should focus on helping practitioners and patients forge effective therapeutic alliances with strong affective bonds and agreement on treatment goals and how to achieve them.

Indexed as

Low Back PainOsteopathic MedicineOsteopathic PhysiciansAdultHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomeback paincomplementary medicineprimary carerehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID34006548
PMCPMC8130743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.