Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34006334›Full record

ReviewMicrobiome2021

The microbiome and mosquito vectorial capacity: rich potential for discovery and translation.

Cintia Cansado-Utrilla, Serena Y Zhao, Philip J McCall, Kerri L Coon, Grant L Hughes

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
27.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Characterizing the Bacterial Microbiome of the Invasive VectorInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cintia Cansado-UtrillaDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Serena Y ZhaoDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Philip J McCallDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Kerri L CoonDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. kerri.coon@wisc.edu.
Grant L HughesDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. grant.hughes@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7567-7185
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Parasitology and Vector Biology Training ProgramT32AI007414 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lyric Colleen Bartholomay · 1992 to 2026
$4.5M
Bacterial delivery of RNAi and CRISPRs for modulation of mosquito transcriptionR21AI124452 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI WEAVER, SCOTT C · 2016 to 2017
$426k
Microbial interplay between ZIKA virus and the native microbiome in mosquitoesR21AI129507 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI HUGHES, GRANT LESLIE · 2017 to 2018
$371k
Exploiting gnotobiotic systems to examine microbiota acquisition in mosquitoes and for microbiome transplantationsR21AI138074 · NIAID · TMLIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE · PI HUGHES, GRANT LESLIE · 2018 to 2019
$296k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001240/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council MR/T001267/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council V011278/1Medical Research Council MR/T001267/1Medical Research Council N013514/1NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI124452NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI129507NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI138074NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007414NIH HHS T32AI007414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome research has gained considerable interest due to the emerging evidence of its impact on human and animal health. As in other animals, the gut-associated microbiota of mosquitoes affect host fitness and other phenotypes. It is now well established that microbes can alter pathogen transmission in mosquitoes, either positively or negatively, and avenues are being explored to exploit microbes for vector control. However, less attention has been paid to how microbiota affect phenotypes that impact vectorial capacity. Several mosquito and pathogen components, such as vector density, biting rate, survival, vector competence, and the pathogen extrinsic incubation period all influence pathogen transmission. Recent studies also indicate that mosquito gut-associated microbes can impact each of these components, and therefore ultimately modulate vectorial capacity. Promisingly, this expands the options available to exploit microbes for vector control by also targeting parameters that affect vectorial capacity. However, there are still many knowledge gaps regarding  mosquito-microbe interactions  that need to be addressed in order to exploit them efficiently. Here, we review current evidence of impacts of the microbiome on aspects of vectorial capacity, and we highlight likely opportunities for novel vector control strategies and areas where further studies are required. Video abstract.

Indexed as

CulicidaeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsHumansMicrobial InteractionsMosquito VectorsBitingCompetenceDensityExtrinsic incubation periodLongevityMicrobiomeMosquitoPathogen transmissionSymbiosisVectorial capacity

Identifiers

PMID34006334
PMCPMC8132434
OpenAlexW3162824331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.